Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 23 May 25 >

May 24

Category:Albums produced by Antonina Armato

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Albums produced by Antonina Armato ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Per precedent, producers have to have multiple solo productions to warrant a category, which Armato does not. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former ISKCON religious figures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename but keep "former". Kbdank71 13:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming Category:Former ISKCON religious figures to Category:International Society for Krishna Consciousness religious figures
Category:ISKCON religious figures to Category:International Society for Krishna Consciousness religious figures
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Expand abbreviation. Do we really need to separate the former leaders from the current leaders? Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian football (soccer) players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per nom per rationale similar to the discussions immediately below. Erik9 ( talk) 01:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: as per below Mayumashu ( talk) 19:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian football squad templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per nom. Erik9 ( talk) 00:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: as per rationale given in nomination below Mayumashu ( talk) 19:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Football (soccer) managers in Australia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 16:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: listed are exclusively managers of association football clubs, and for Australia, the term 'football' requires clarity and therefore should have the standard wikipedia disambiguate 'football (soccer)' Mayumashu ( talk) 18:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Folk musical instruments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Folk musical instruments ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. We've already merged all subcats of this cat into Category:Musical instruments by nationality, and only the parent cat remains. I still submit that MIbN fulfills basically the entire role of this cat, and that the current Category:Folk musical instruments is an impediment to proper categorisation. As it stands, a lot of new articles are chucked into this cat when they are clearly applicable to Category:Nepalese musical instruments, etc. The actual term "folk" is pretty vague, and though I personally enjoy many genres deemed "folk music" I feel the term inhibits proper categorisation and smacks of Western bias. That is, classical Chinese and Indian instruments get lumped as "folk" because they aren't generally played by elderly white Bostonians in tuxedos. I submit that Category:Musical instruments by nationality can take this cat's place in both the Category:Folk music tree and the Category:Musical instruments tree with a major net benefit to the trees and lessened chances of specifically Peruvian/Albanian/Kuwaiti/Malaysian instruments being chucked into "Folk" categories. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Humane Order of African Redemption

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. If lisification is desired, I will provide the articles. Kbdank71 16:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Humane Order of African Redemption ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete/Listify? Rename? - Is this sufficiently prestigious per WP:OC#AWARD for a category? If not then delete, otherwise rename to Category:Liberian Humane Order of African Redemption recipients per many other award recipients categories. Otto4711 ( talk) 17:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

First draft picks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: as follows: Delete Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks, rename Category:American Football League First Overall Draft Picks to Category:American Football League first overall draft picks, keep the rest. Kbdank71 16:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:National Hockey League first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:National Hockey League first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:World Hockey Association first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:World Hockey Association first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Women's National Basketball Association first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:National Football League first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:American Football League First Overall Draft Picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - per a number of previous discussions, consensus is that being selected as the first round draft pick of a particular team is not a defining characteristic. It does not seem to me that being the first round pick within a particular league's draft or having been the first person selected overall in a particular draft is any more defining. If kept then the AFL category needs to be renamed to correct the capitalization. Otto4711 ( talk) 16:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All (with one possible exception) All of these categories are capturing clear defining characteristics, though I would probably have thought differently of Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks if it weren't lumped together in apparent ignorance as a minor league. While many baseball players drafted in the first round never make the parent team, first overall draft picks in Hockey, Basketball or Football are almost always the top athletes in the sport and are defined by their selection as first pick overall or in the first round. The drama and hype that surrounds the draft of the NFL, especially the first round, is indicative of the strong defining nature of being selected in the first round or first overall. Nominator would benefit greatly from having any understanding of the categories involved rather than trying to ram any vaguely similar categories into the garbage chute based on utterly irrelevant "precedent". Alansohn ( talk) 18:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All Unlike the previous discussion which were categorized by teams. This is an overall league cat, it is extremely defining of a player to be selected in the first round of the draft. They get excessive coverage in the media for this very reason. To be a first round pick in most professional sports is akin to receiving a top honour. - Djsasso ( talk) 02:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All, Agree with Djsasso, that a first round draft pick in the NHL is high honour. I do not completely agree that the OHL is just any minor league, but the importance of the draft picks for the OHL are much less. It should be evaluated seperately.-- That's Life, "Stuff" happens, people die, life goes on. ( talk) 02:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep the hockey categories - being a first rounder or first overall pick most certainly is notable for such players. No opinion on the WNBA, NFL and AFL cats. Reso lute 02:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the Ontario Hockey League category, as it is a category for ice hockey players drafted out of a particular league, and not defining in ice hockey, and
  • Keep the other categories, as they are in regards to major professional leagues, and defining in regards to the players. Kaiser matias ( talk) 03:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Can you clarify what do you mean by: the OHL category is for "ice hockey players drafted out of a particular league"? — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 12:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The OHL category is for NHL players who were drafted from the OHL. That is not as defining as the other categories, seeing how they are all professional leagues, while the OHL is a junior league with an age limit on players. Kaiser matias ( talk) 17:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Actually that category was for players drafted in the first round of the OHL draft. - Djsasso ( talk) 18:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
If that is the case, then I'm even more opposed to the category. Few OHL first rounders become professional, so the majority of anyone in this category would be not notable enough. Kaiser matias ( talk) 04:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soccer clubs in Adelaide

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Soccer clubs in Adelaide ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Replaced by Category:Football (soccer) clubs in Adelaide. See discussion on talk page. timsdad (talk) 12:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Converts to Scientology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Converts to Scientology ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Scientology is compatible with other religions. (see Scientology and other religions) This a basic tenet of Scientology. Secondly, as a new wave religion, most Scientologists are not born into it, making this categorization superfluous. Gilliam ( talk) 07:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishnas by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 16:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming Category:Hare Krishnas by nationality to Category:Gaudiya Vaishnavas by nationality
Nominator's rationale: Correct name of the religion is Gaudiya Vaishnava or more specifically ISKCON Wikid as© 07:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Infection-related dermatology categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 16:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename. I started the WP:DERM taskforce, and have been working to categorize dermatology articles in an organized fashion. The proposed categorization scheme is specifically at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Dermatology_task_force/Categorization, which was developed from discussions at the main wikipedia medicine page (see that link for more details). As per that scheme, the term "skin" should probably be renamed to "cutaneous" as the scope of these categories are not strictly limited to conditions that affect the skin, but also the mucous membranes (i.e. inside the mouth, lining of the eyes, nose, etc.). There also seems to be a strong consensus in favor of using the term "cutaneous" in this context. For a listing of conditions being considered part of these categories, see the list_of_skin-related_conditions#Infectious_skin_diseases. With that being said, if this rename is enacted, I will (1) add additional information to the category introductions discussing the category title in language directed towards the general reader, and (2) create redirects from the existing category names. --- kilbad ( talk) 02:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - I think having "-related" is important because certain conditions being included are not merely active infections by a particular pathogen (whether it be a virus, bacterium, etc.). Several conditions being included are complications/ sequela of infectious processes, therefore related to the infection but not the infection itself. --- kilbad ( talk) 11:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia coast

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (was empty at close). Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia coast ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate of Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia (U.S. state) coast. MoS for categories related to Georgia (U.S. state) is to avoid confusion with Georgia (country). APK straight up now tell me 00:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishnas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 13:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Hare Krishnas ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty cat Wikid as© 00:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 13:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty cat Wikid as© 00:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
It is however inappropriate to put BLP in this category if it is already in Category:ISKCON religious figures. Since this person should not be there the category is empty and thus must be deleted. Wikid as© 16:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_24&oldid=1138392906"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 23 May 25 >

May 24

Category:Albums produced by Antonina Armato

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Albums produced by Antonina Armato ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Per precedent, producers have to have multiple solo productions to warrant a category, which Armato does not. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ( Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 23:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Former ISKCON religious figures

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename but keep "former". Kbdank71 13:42, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming Category:Former ISKCON religious figures to Category:International Society for Krishna Consciousness religious figures
Category:ISKCON religious figures to Category:International Society for Krishna Consciousness religious figures
Nominator's rationale: Rename. Expand abbreviation. Do we really need to separate the former leaders from the current leaders? Vegaswikian ( talk) 19:08, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian football (soccer) players

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per nom per rationale similar to the discussions immediately below. Erik9 ( talk) 01:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: as per below Mayumashu ( talk) 19:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Australian football squad templates

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename per nom. Erik9 ( talk) 00:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: as per rationale given in nomination below Mayumashu ( talk) 19:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Football (soccer) managers in Australia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 16:01, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: listed are exclusively managers of association football clubs, and for Australia, the term 'football' requires clarity and therefore should have the standard wikipedia disambiguate 'football (soccer)' Mayumashu ( talk) 18:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Folk musical instruments

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Folk musical instruments ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. We've already merged all subcats of this cat into Category:Musical instruments by nationality, and only the parent cat remains. I still submit that MIbN fulfills basically the entire role of this cat, and that the current Category:Folk musical instruments is an impediment to proper categorisation. As it stands, a lot of new articles are chucked into this cat when they are clearly applicable to Category:Nepalese musical instruments, etc. The actual term "folk" is pretty vague, and though I personally enjoy many genres deemed "folk music" I feel the term inhibits proper categorisation and smacks of Western bias. That is, classical Chinese and Indian instruments get lumped as "folk" because they aren't generally played by elderly white Bostonians in tuxedos. I submit that Category:Musical instruments by nationality can take this cat's place in both the Category:Folk music tree and the Category:Musical instruments tree with a major net benefit to the trees and lessened chances of specifically Peruvian/Albanian/Kuwaiti/Malaysian instruments being chucked into "Folk" categories. MatthewVanitas ( talk) 18:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Humane Order of African Redemption

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. If lisification is desired, I will provide the articles. Kbdank71 16:04, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Humane Order of African Redemption ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete/Listify? Rename? - Is this sufficiently prestigious per WP:OC#AWARD for a category? If not then delete, otherwise rename to Category:Liberian Humane Order of African Redemption recipients per many other award recipients categories. Otto4711 ( talk) 17:58, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

First draft picks

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: as follows: Delete Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks, rename Category:American Football League First Overall Draft Picks to Category:American Football League first overall draft picks, keep the rest. Kbdank71 16:07, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:National Hockey League first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:National Hockey League first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:World Hockey Association first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:World Hockey Association first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:Women's National Basketball Association first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:National Football League first overall draft picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:American Football League First Overall Draft Picks ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete - per a number of previous discussions, consensus is that being selected as the first round draft pick of a particular team is not a defining characteristic. It does not seem to me that being the first round pick within a particular league's draft or having been the first person selected overall in a particular draft is any more defining. If kept then the AFL category needs to be renamed to correct the capitalization. Otto4711 ( talk) 16:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All (with one possible exception) All of these categories are capturing clear defining characteristics, though I would probably have thought differently of Category:Ontario Hockey League first round draft picks if it weren't lumped together in apparent ignorance as a minor league. While many baseball players drafted in the first round never make the parent team, first overall draft picks in Hockey, Basketball or Football are almost always the top athletes in the sport and are defined by their selection as first pick overall or in the first round. The drama and hype that surrounds the draft of the NFL, especially the first round, is indicative of the strong defining nature of being selected in the first round or first overall. Nominator would benefit greatly from having any understanding of the categories involved rather than trying to ram any vaguely similar categories into the garbage chute based on utterly irrelevant "precedent". Alansohn ( talk) 18:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All Unlike the previous discussion which were categorized by teams. This is an overall league cat, it is extremely defining of a player to be selected in the first round of the draft. They get excessive coverage in the media for this very reason. To be a first round pick in most professional sports is akin to receiving a top honour. - Djsasso ( talk) 02:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep All, Agree with Djsasso, that a first round draft pick in the NHL is high honour. I do not completely agree that the OHL is just any minor league, but the importance of the draft picks for the OHL are much less. It should be evaluated seperately.-- That's Life, "Stuff" happens, people die, life goes on. ( talk) 02:53, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Keep the hockey categories - being a first rounder or first overall pick most certainly is notable for such players. No opinion on the WNBA, NFL and AFL cats. Reso lute 02:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Delete the Ontario Hockey League category, as it is a category for ice hockey players drafted out of a particular league, and not defining in ice hockey, and
  • Keep the other categories, as they are in regards to major professional leagues, and defining in regards to the players. Kaiser matias ( talk) 03:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Can you clarify what do you mean by: the OHL category is for "ice hockey players drafted out of a particular league"? — Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 12:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The OHL category is for NHL players who were drafted from the OHL. That is not as defining as the other categories, seeing how they are all professional leagues, while the OHL is a junior league with an age limit on players. Kaiser matias ( talk) 17:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Actually that category was for players drafted in the first round of the OHL draft. - Djsasso ( talk) 18:16, 26 May 2009 (UTC) reply
If that is the case, then I'm even more opposed to the category. Few OHL first rounders become professional, so the majority of anyone in this category would be not notable enough. Kaiser matias ( talk) 04:51, 30 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Soccer clubs in Adelaide

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Soccer clubs in Adelaide ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Replaced by Category:Football (soccer) clubs in Adelaide. See discussion on talk page. timsdad (talk) 12:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Converts to Scientology

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Kbdank71 16:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Converts to Scientology ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Delete. Scientology is compatible with other religions. (see Scientology and other religions) This a basic tenet of Scientology. Secondly, as a new wave religion, most Scientologists are not born into it, making this categorization superfluous. Gilliam ( talk) 07:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishnas by nationality

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 16:14, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming Category:Hare Krishnas by nationality to Category:Gaudiya Vaishnavas by nationality
Nominator's rationale: Correct name of the religion is Gaudiya Vaishnava or more specifically ISKCON Wikid as© 07:18, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Infection-related dermatology categories

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. Kbdank71 16:10, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Propose renaming
Nominator's rationale: Rename. I started the WP:DERM taskforce, and have been working to categorize dermatology articles in an organized fashion. The proposed categorization scheme is specifically at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Medicine/Dermatology_task_force/Categorization, which was developed from discussions at the main wikipedia medicine page (see that link for more details). As per that scheme, the term "skin" should probably be renamed to "cutaneous" as the scope of these categories are not strictly limited to conditions that affect the skin, but also the mucous membranes (i.e. inside the mouth, lining of the eyes, nose, etc.). There also seems to be a strong consensus in favor of using the term "cutaneous" in this context. For a listing of conditions being considered part of these categories, see the list_of_skin-related_conditions#Infectious_skin_diseases. With that being said, if this rename is enacted, I will (1) add additional information to the category introductions discussing the category title in language directed towards the general reader, and (2) create redirects from the existing category names. --- kilbad ( talk) 02:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - I think having "-related" is important because certain conditions being included are not merely active infections by a particular pathogen (whether it be a virus, bacterium, etc.). Several conditions being included are complications/ sequela of infectious processes, therefore related to the infection but not the infection itself. --- kilbad ( talk) 11:20, 28 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia coast

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete (was empty at close). Good Ol’factory (talk) 06:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia coast ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Duplicate of Category:Shipwrecks of the Georgia (U.S. state) coast. MoS for categories related to Georgia (U.S. state) is to avoid confusion with Georgia (country). APK straight up now tell me 00:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishnas

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 13:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Hare Krishnas ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty cat Wikid as© 00:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: no consensus. Kbdank71 13:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC) reply
Category:Hare Krishna religious leaders ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Nominator's rationale: Empty cat Wikid as© 00:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC) reply
It is however inappropriate to put BLP in this category if it is already in Category:ISKCON religious figures. Since this person should not be there the category is empty and thus must be deleted. Wikid as© 16:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_May_24&oldid=1138392906"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE