December 10
Category:Miss Hong Kong prize winners
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:45, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Miss Hong Kong prize winners to
Category:Miss Hong Kong award winners
- Nominator's rationale: The category should be renamed to "award winners" instead of "prize winners" as it includes delegates who just special award winners as well, not just the top 3 "prize" winners.
smileydude66 (
talk) 23:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - if I'm understanding the purpose of the category, it is not for women who are named "Miss Hong Kong" within any pageant structure such as
Miss World or
Miss Universe but is instead for any competitor in the
Miss Hong Kong Pageant who wins any prize or award through that pageant. It would be like having a category for the winners of "Miss Congeniality" or "Miss Photogenic" from the
Miss USA pageant.
Otto4711 (
talk) 23:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Otto.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nintendo Setting articles
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Nintendo Setting articles (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Category is empty due to article consolidation.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 21:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I created this category a long time ago hoping that others would fill it. It goes along with the other ones in
Category:Nintendo articles by type. This one was intended for fictional Nintendo settings (such as
Hyrule). I just thought it would be easier having the articles sorted by type. If it isn't working out I have no problem with it being deleted, but if someone wanted to help out with filling it, it could be useful. –
bse3 (
talk •
contribs •
count •
logs) 01:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Thor
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was merge
Category:Thor to
Category:Marvel Comics Asgardians.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:46, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Category:Thor (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete-Nominator's rationale:
This cat is parented by
Category:Marvel Comics Asgardians which is more encompassing; however, the bulk of characters are duel eligible. There is no need to sub cat these characters at the expense of the parent cat, in addition there no need for redundancy. -
66.109.248.114 (
talk) 21:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC).
reply
- Comment: I would recommend outright deletion over merge, as all the characters in the Thor cat are already listed in the Asgardian cat. -
66.109.248.114 (
talk) 23:54, 15 December 2007 (UTC).
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Rival Schools characters
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:48, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Rival Schools characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: One character category per article consolidation.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 21:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Urban fashion
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Hip hop fashion. As long as the article redirects to
hip hop fashion, the category should be named that. If an article on urban fashion is written that shows significant differences, this can be reconsidered.--
Mike Selinker (
talk) 01:58, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Urban fashion (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Marketing term w/o clear definition, highly dependent on region and a time. As more than half of population on the planet lives in urban areas it may be hard to identify what will not eventually end up in this category. Created by a new user enriching Wikipedia with ad-like articles about fashion brands.
Urban fashion was originally redirect to
Hip hop fashion, now it points to the category.
Pavel Vozenilek (
talk) 21:03, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. Seems potentially duplicative of
hip hop fashion. I would just leave that one personally unless someone can explain the criteria that differentiate the two. By the way, the articles this new user is adding are good and of brands/concepts that are or appear notable in urban/hip-hop fashion. I'm surprised we didn't have an article about (for example)
all over print already.
68.160.5.32 (
talk) 04:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Urban fashion is subjective and changes over time.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Merge or Rename Merge to
Category:Hip hop fashion or
Category:2000s fashion or rename to Street fashion or
Streetwear or "Contemporary streetwear". Several of these have no other cats & should not be orphaned.
Johnbod (
talk) 22:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. The objections to the vagueness of the term
urban fashion are well taken. However, the term is commonly used as a self-description among people who are familiar with it, and is somewhat synonymous with streetwear. I chose to create urban fashion because it is the most general descriptor, in my opinion somewhat more inclusive than streetwear. I think an article entitled
urban fashion, or
contemporary urban fashion, needs to be written and
hip hop fashion should be subsumed underneath that moniker. This is because
hip hop fashion is quite clearly a part of a larger movement that includes significant contributions from other areas (such as Japanese
bricolage design) that don't necessarily identify with hip hop culture. To respond to the above deletion comment, urban fashion, like all areas of
fashion, obviously changes over time but also has a clear continuity, and anyone who spends even a cursory amount of time researching the topic (
Format Magazine,
Sneaker Freaker) will see it that it is an international and unitary design culture.
Munificentdesign (
talk) 23:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Phantasy Star characters
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Phantasy Star characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Empty category.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 20:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Quest for Glory characters
Category:Kirby characters
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Kirby characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Empty category, subcategory also empty due to article consolidation.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 20:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Delete - although the category is not empty, the one article in it is well-enough categorized without this category.
Otto4711 (
talk) 01:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
TTN (
talk) 23:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Farscape planets
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Farscape planets (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Empty category.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 20:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Futurama planets
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Futurama planets (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Category now empty per article consolidation.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 20:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Nightmare Enterprises monsters
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Nightmare Enterprises monsters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Category now empty
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 20:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
TTN (
talk) 23:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Charismatic religious leaders
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
After Midnight
0001 04:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Charismatic religious leaders (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Renominating because
previous nominator did not tag the category. Previous nominator had nominated saying "isn't this POV?"
Lquilter (
talk) 18:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- delete - Isn't this POV? - Yes, it is. I had assumed that this would be an unfortunately ambiguous title for leaders in the
Charismatic movement, but, no; this is "religious leaders who have charismatic power" or something like that. (The definition on the category describes it as, This category contains religious leaders whose main basis of authority was or is based on charismatic authority, following Max Weber's classification of authority.) So it should be deleted, or completely redefined and renamed unambiguously to be
Category:Leaders in the charismatic religious movement. --
Lquilter (
talk) 22:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC) (reposted from prior deletion discussion; notices to previous discussants posted)
reply
- Delete mostly matches the religion section of
List of charismatic leaders as defined by Max Weber's classification of authority, which might be acceptable for a list - maybe- but certainly isn't for a category, especially without the explanation in the name. repeating my previous comment. I think bencherlite was correct not to delete an untagged category btw.
Johnbod (
talk) 19:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Lquilter. Category would be useful if it did classify leaders of the "charismatic movement", but the current definition is POV and very subjective.
Snocrates 21:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Almost certainly it would get misused.
Pavel Vozenilek (
talk) 23:33, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete redundant with
List of charismatic leaders as defined by Max Weber's classification of authority. It's hard enough keeping the list itself 'clean' of assertions that 'person x belongs here because I have a quote saying s/he was charismatic'.
Maralia (
talk) 21:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom, Johnbod, Lquilter...
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ajax Amsterdam
Category:El Cor de la Ciutat
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 22:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:El Cor de la Ciutat (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete - eponymous overcategorization for TV series. Material doesn't warrant the category per extensive precedent.
Otto4711 (
talk) 17:49, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Bear in the Big Blue House
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
After Midnight
0001 04:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Bear in the Big Blue House (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete - unnecessary eponymous category for the show article.
Otto4711 (
talk) 17:41, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Elder Scrolls creatures
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:The Elder Scrolls creatures (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Category now empty.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 17:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Metroid characters
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Metroid characters (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Empty category due to article consolidation.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 17:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom.
TTN (
talk) 23:36, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Factions in Mortal Kombat
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was merge into
Category:Mortal Kombat.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Factions in Mortal Kombat (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: All other factions have been deleted except one, upmerge to category Mortal Kombat.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 15:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete. -
Andrew c
[talk] 22:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Players who played for both Old Firm clubs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Upmerge to both parents, most players have played for several teams during their careers, and switching to a rival team isn't that uncommon. If kept it should at least be Renamed since
Old Firm may not be well known outside of Scotland. --
Prove It
(talk) 15:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Oh. Speedy delete has been declined on the basis that the category is at CfD and is populated. Should have nuked it myself...
Bencherlite
Talk 19:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - I thought this had coem up before. The previous CfD was fairly clear-cut, so I don't see why it could not have been speedied. The category was populated by its creator. --
Daemonic Kangaroo (
talk) 19:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per Bencherlite & nom.
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - I didn't know of the previous CfD debate but that deletion seems to have been based on an argument which seems to be "We should delete this article to prevent others like it from being created", which is
logically identical to the
WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS argument which has so often been described as fallacious.
ugen64 (
talk) 05:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Delete since it is not a defining characteristic and is over categorization.
Vegaswikian (
talk) 02:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:San Andreas (Grand Theft Auto)
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete/upmerge. -
Andrew c
[talk] 22:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:San Andreas (Grand Theft Auto) (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: There is now only one article in this category.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 14:36, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Political games
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was merge. -
Andrew c
[talk] 22:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Suggest merging
Category:Political games to
Category:Government simulation video games
- Nominator's rationale: Merge, Very small category. Main article up for AfD.
SharkD (
talk) 06:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Merge. Category name should be self-explanatory.
Doczilla (
talk) 07:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Merge per nom, lest we have dirty tricks included. :-)
Carlossuarez46 (
talk) 22:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:The Elder Scrolls lore
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:12, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:The Elder Scrolls lore (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Category is probably empty as you read this, and as of my writing has one article about to be deleted and the other merged, so it will soon be empty.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 06:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
It should not be deleted because it was just created.
- ...last march, and most of the articles in the category have been deleted, with the final two likely to be too.
Judgesurreal777 (
talk) 13:19, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Fictional loners
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
After Midnight
0001 04:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Fictional loners (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: Delete wholly subjective category that cannot have any objective or non-arbitrary inclusion criteria.
Doczilla (
talk) 04:57, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Delaware State Representatives
Category:Members of the Nevada Senate
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
After Midnight
0001 05:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Members of the Nevada Senate to
Category:Nevada State Senators
- Nominator's rationale: Rename. All other subcategories of
Category:State senators of the United States are named "Foo State Sentators"; rename for consistency.
Snocrates 03:51, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Legislative branch of Oklahoma government
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was merge.
After Midnight
0001 05:10, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Suggest merging
Category:Legislative branch of Oklahoma government to
Category:Oklahoma Legislature
- Nominator's rationale: Merge, Duplicate material and names are different ways of referring to the same thing. No other U.S. state has similarly-named category of "Legislative branch of Foo".
Snocrates 02:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Legislative Branch of the Government of Puerto Rico
Category:U.S. territorial lower houses by territory
Category:Speakers of state Houses of Representatives
Category:Oh My Goddess! episodes
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:05, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Oh My Goddess! episodes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Nominator's rationale: The various episodes have been redirected, so it no longer has any use.
TTN (
talk) 01:31, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Wisconsin State Legislature
Category:Nebraska State Legislators
Category:Hawaii State Legislature
Category:Vermont Legislature
Category:Maine State Legislature
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
After Midnight
0001 04:48, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Maine State Legislature to
Category:Maine Legislature
- Nominator's rationale: Rename for consistency with main (ha ha) article,
Maine Legislature. Subcategory is
Category:Members of the Maine Legislature.
Snocrates 01:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Washington State Representatives
Category:Minnesota State Legislature
Category:Alaska State Legislature
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
After Midnight
0001 04:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Alaska State Legislature to
Category:Alaska Legislature
- Nominator's rationale: Main article is at
Alaska Legislature; subcategory is
Category:Members of the Alaska Legislature; rename category for consistency.
Snocrates 01:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Delay Repay participating TOCs
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was delete.
Angus McLellan
(Talk) 23:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
-
Category:Delay Repay participating TOCs (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
- Delete
- Nominator's rationale: 'Delay Repay' is just the name given by some train operating companies for the clause in the National Rail Conditions of Carriage describing compensation that must be given in the event of severe delays. For this reason, every TOC must participate in 'Delay Repay', even if they don't call it that, and by that reasoning every TOC should be in this category. However, all UK TOCs are already listed
here, and if a category for them is needed, it should not be named 'Delay Repay'.
TheIslander 00:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Kharkovites
- The following discussion is an archived debate regarding the category or categories above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename.
After Midnight
0001 04:47, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- Propose renaming
Category:Kharkovites to
Category:People from Kharkiv
- Nominator's rationale: Rename. Per convention, People from Place.
Kolindigo (
talk) 00:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.