The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
rename. sub-category pages listed here are of both ethnic and national origins. its too POV (and pointless, i say) to differeniate between origins by ethnicity and origins by country Mayumashu 04:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Consistency with all the other Macintosh categories. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 01:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(because the main article about this group is Chabad-Lubavitch with the hyphen in its name) and to match with all the others (in the master category of Category:Hasidic dynasties) such as Category:Satmar Hasidism; Category:Ger Hasidism; Category:Bobov Hasidism etc. IZAK 21:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(to match new cat Category:George W. Bush administration controversies, tho now I wonder if both should be capital "A"dministration) -- Syrthiss 12:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
to be consistent with Category:Reform Jewish day schools, Category:Modern Orthodox Jewish day schools etc. IZAK 03:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. Syrthiss 15:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
*Objection These aren't eligible for speedy renaming.
Osomec
14:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a silly and highly POV category that may even be offensive. None of the subjects in it had admitted to being "former" anythings! (Indeed there is already Category:Prominent Lubavitchers which is much more neutral.) Will Wikipedia now list Category:Former Reform Jews or Category:Former Hasidim or how about Category:Former Jews etc. as well? The thought of which is hilarious and pathetic if one considers that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. This category violates the rules of NPOV and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and possibly borders on violating Wikipedia:Libel. It should be deleted. IZAK 21:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. - EurekaLott 22:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The original author made a typo in the name, it should have been Calumet County. I moved the only article to the correct category Category:Calumet County. *Delete nom by Royalbroil 16:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Online communities are virtual communities, and while actually a subset, the terms are used 100% interchangeably. Avi 15:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 15:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
It seems to lack any real amount of articles, with no forseeable improvement any time soon. Articles all fit well into other categories as well. Delete - The DJ 03:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
A duplicate of category:Women's basketball players. However, that category has only subcategories by league and status, not individuals. The few individuals represented here are already in those subcategories.
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
POV category. Who defines a "child support recidivist"? What is the academic authority for the term and its definition? Who decides whether an individual case merits this appeallation? How many of these self-identify as "deadbeat dads"? If we can't come up with a less pejorative category than this it would be better to have no category at all. Just zis Guy you know? 12:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
rename. sub-category pages listed here are of both ethnic and national origins. its too POV (and pointless, i say) to differeniate between origins by ethnicity and origins by country Mayumashu 04:09, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Consistency with all the other Macintosh categories. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 01:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:52, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(because the main article about this group is Chabad-Lubavitch with the hyphen in its name) and to match with all the others (in the master category of Category:Hasidic dynasties) such as Category:Satmar Hasidism; Category:Ger Hasidism; Category:Bobov Hasidism etc. IZAK 21:31, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(to match new cat Category:George W. Bush administration controversies, tho now I wonder if both should be capital "A"dministration) -- Syrthiss 12:50, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 15:49, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
to be consistent with Category:Reform Jewish day schools, Category:Modern Orthodox Jewish day schools etc. IZAK 03:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename all. Syrthiss 15:48, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
*Objection These aren't eligible for speedy renaming.
Osomec
14:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a silly and highly POV category that may even be offensive. None of the subjects in it had admitted to being "former" anythings! (Indeed there is already Category:Prominent Lubavitchers which is much more neutral.) Will Wikipedia now list Category:Former Reform Jews or Category:Former Hasidim or how about Category:Former Jews etc. as well? The thought of which is hilarious and pathetic if one considers that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. This category violates the rules of NPOV and Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and possibly borders on violating Wikipedia:Libel. It should be deleted. IZAK 21:19, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. - EurekaLott 22:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The original author made a typo in the name, it should have been Calumet County. I moved the only article to the correct category Category:Calumet County. *Delete nom by Royalbroil 16:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Online communities are virtual communities, and while actually a subset, the terms are used 100% interchangeably. Avi 15:42, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 15:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
It seems to lack any real amount of articles, with no forseeable improvement any time soon. Articles all fit well into other categories as well. Delete - The DJ 03:18, 24 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
A duplicate of category:Women's basketball players. However, that category has only subcategories by league and status, not individuals. The few individuals represented here are already in those subcategories.
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 15:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC) reply
POV category. Who defines a "child support recidivist"? What is the academic authority for the term and its definition? Who decides whether an individual case merits this appeallation? How many of these self-identify as "deadbeat dads"? If we can't come up with a less pejorative category than this it would be better to have no category at all. Just zis Guy you know? 12:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC) reply