The result of the debate was Moved to TfD. Vegaswikian 00:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary to have a form of voting for speedy deletes. The number of requests is not important. The only issue is does the proposed article meet the policy to be speedey deleted. Vegaswikian 00:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This is an article/list not a category and is not a suitable as a list either as it is not by country. Delete Golfcam 22:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This was nominated for renaming to category:Regional theatre in the United States, but someone created that during the nomination and now we have both. I don't think it is a useful category for other countries, not even the UK (for example the Royal Shakespeare Company straddles the London/regional divide), so I don't want to see this kept as it may encourage the creation of subcategories for other countries. I'm not even sure about the U.S. category, but will leave it to Americans to decide whether to keep that, but for other countries, it is a false division and can only reduce the usefulness of the theatre categories, few of which are at all large in any case. It is particularly irrelevant in countries with no dominant theatrical centre, eg Australia, France, Germany and many other major countries. Delete. Bhoeble 20:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete with fire from orbit. Syrthiss 14:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category does not seem useful to me, it's categorizing living people based on an unimportant physical characteristic, which does not affect any other aspect of the person's life. Mak emi 20:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 14:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
As explained 2 items down this category relates to all the arts, not just to visual art, which is what is meant by "art" in the Wikipedia category system (apart from other categories created under a misapprehension). I fear that every single art category needs to be renamed to "visual arts" to try to arrest this recurring confusion. Bhoeble 20:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Latinus 21:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a relisting of two debates from
March 9 2006 to try and settle the "in/of" matter. Included categories are:
As a relisting admin, I make no choice as I might have to be the one to close this...tho at the moment I have them listed for renaming using the "of". -- Syrthiss 20:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was kept. Syrthiss 14:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
As part of reorganizing the subcategories of Category:Lists I created Category:Art lists and Category:Society lists and moved all the relevant pages from Category:Culture lists to the new categories. This left nothing in Culture lists so I'm proposing that it be deleted. JeffW 17:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. Syrthiss 13:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Bartok wrote just one opera - Duke Bluebeard's Castle - and the probability that we will ever discover a second vanishingly miniscule. There is already a category for operas, so it will readily appear there. The category therefore seems redundant. JGF Wilks 13:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. Syrthiss 13:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Beethoven wrote just one opera - Fidelio - and the probability that we will ever discover a second vanishingly miniscule. There is already a category for operas, so Fidelio will readily appear there. The category therefore seems redundant JGF Wilks 13:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category was created during a AfD which was clearly heading for delete, every item in the category is obviously part of one or more significant comedy categories already. I think Irishpunktom's heart might be in the right place but you can't create categories from 3 year old arbitrary web lists that are losing an AfD. Deizio 12:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Ships built in the United Kingdom. Syrthiss 14:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Great Britain refers to the country, not the island. CG janitor 07:20, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Latinus 00:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename category abbreviation to match common usage abbreviation: "The
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (commonly known by the abbreviation ICD) is a detailed description of known diseases and injuries."
Rfrisbie
talk 03:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was depop and redirect. Syrthiss 14:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The latter category is the correct spelling. Both categories contain the same articles. (I thought I'd already added them to this page on 3/14; guess not.) Gyrofrog (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 14:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Claims in the header that its only for Avagadgro's Number based units, but not all such units are amounts of substance. Faraday for instance is an amount of electric charge. I've created Category:Units based on Avagadro's number and have added the three articles from the first category, as well as the article on the Faraday. Swestrup 22:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete both per gene nygaard's argument. Syrthiss 14:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Accidentally created this category by accident. All the articles actually (and correctly) point to Category:Units based on Avagadro's number, so this category page now serves no purpose. Swestrup 22:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Moved to TfD. Vegaswikian 00:44, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Unnecessary to have a form of voting for speedy deletes. The number of requests is not important. The only issue is does the proposed article meet the policy to be speedey deleted. Vegaswikian 00:01, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This is an article/list not a category and is not a suitable as a list either as it is not by country. Delete Golfcam 22:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This was nominated for renaming to category:Regional theatre in the United States, but someone created that during the nomination and now we have both. I don't think it is a useful category for other countries, not even the UK (for example the Royal Shakespeare Company straddles the London/regional divide), so I don't want to see this kept as it may encourage the creation of subcategories for other countries. I'm not even sure about the U.S. category, but will leave it to Americans to decide whether to keep that, but for other countries, it is a false division and can only reduce the usefulness of the theatre categories, few of which are at all large in any case. It is particularly irrelevant in countries with no dominant theatrical centre, eg Australia, France, Germany and many other major countries. Delete. Bhoeble 20:59, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete with fire from orbit. Syrthiss 14:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category does not seem useful to me, it's categorizing living people based on an unimportant physical characteristic, which does not affect any other aspect of the person's life. Mak emi 20:49, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 14:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
As explained 2 items down this category relates to all the arts, not just to visual art, which is what is meant by "art" in the Wikipedia category system (apart from other categories created under a misapprehension). I fear that every single art category needs to be renamed to "visual arts" to try to arrest this recurring confusion. Bhoeble 20:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Latinus 21:47, 21 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This is a relisting of two debates from
March 9 2006 to try and settle the "in/of" matter. Included categories are:
As a relisting admin, I make no choice as I might have to be the one to close this...tho at the moment I have them listed for renaming using the "of". -- Syrthiss 20:26, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was kept. Syrthiss 14:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
As part of reorganizing the subcategories of Category:Lists I created Category:Art lists and Category:Society lists and moved all the relevant pages from Category:Culture lists to the new categories. This left nothing in Culture lists so I'm proposing that it be deleted. JeffW 17:35, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. Syrthiss 13:56, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Bartok wrote just one opera - Duke Bluebeard's Castle - and the probability that we will ever discover a second vanishingly miniscule. There is already a category for operas, so it will readily appear there. The category therefore seems redundant. JGF Wilks 13:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. Syrthiss 13:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Beethoven wrote just one opera - Fidelio - and the probability that we will ever discover a second vanishingly miniscule. There is already a category for operas, so Fidelio will readily appear there. The category therefore seems redundant JGF Wilks 13:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category was created during a AfD which was clearly heading for delete, every item in the category is obviously part of one or more significant comedy categories already. I think Irishpunktom's heart might be in the right place but you can't create categories from 3 year old arbitrary web lists that are losing an AfD. Deizio 12:03, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Ships built in the United Kingdom. Syrthiss 14:29, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Great Britain refers to the country, not the island. CG janitor 07:20, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Latinus 00:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename category abbreviation to match common usage abbreviation: "The
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (commonly known by the abbreviation ICD) is a detailed description of known diseases and injuries."
Rfrisbie
talk 03:57, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was depop and redirect. Syrthiss 14:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The latter category is the correct spelling. Both categories contain the same articles. (I thought I'd already added them to this page on 3/14; guess not.) Gyrofrog (talk) 03:04, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Syrthiss 14:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Claims in the header that its only for Avagadgro's Number based units, but not all such units are amounts of substance. Faraday for instance is an amount of electric charge. I've created Category:Units based on Avagadro's number and have added the three articles from the first category, as well as the article on the Faraday. Swestrup 22:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete both per gene nygaard's argument. Syrthiss 14:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Accidentally created this category by accident. All the articles actually (and correctly) point to Category:Units based on Avagadro's number, so this category page now serves no purpose. Swestrup 22:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply