The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 14:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The only skiers in the present category are freestyle skiers, as one would expect, given its two sibling categories Category:Cross country skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics and Category:Alpine Skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics (the latter subject to speedy renaming to Category:Alpine skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics (capitalization)). There are no (snow) skiers other than alpine, cross country and freestyle at the Olympics (or in general). -- Mareklug talk 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category is duplicting the content of Category:Mountains and hills of Northern Ireland. In the interests of avoiding confusion and consistancy with the other UK mountain categories, I think it should be deleted. Stu ’Bout ye! 16:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
What is the criterion of being famous? Who decides whether a statue is famous or not? It is too arbitrary a criterion for categorisation. --
Ghirla
-трёп- 10:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category of things related to a site that itself has no entry and does not meet WP:WEB (alexa rank 93,000). part of a series of self-serving articles created today by Chaz365; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allah-Kitten controversy. Delete. bikeable (talk) 04:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedied already by BorgHunter. Syrthiss 21:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply
"Coptography" is a neologism - see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptography. FreplySpang (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nomination below goes through. Probably unpopulatable without breaching neutrality and verifiability by using legendary dates. Delete. Hawkestone 02:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Same arguments apply as for various categories below. Delete Hawkestone 02:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nomination below goes through. Probably unpopulatable without breaching neutrality and verifiability by using legendary dates. Delete Hawkestone 02:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty and almost certainly unpopulatable. Most likely contained a legendary birth date which someone (appropriately) moved out. Delete Hawkestone 02:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Missed this one a minute ago. Will be empty if the other nominations go though. Delete Hawkestone 01:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will contain neither articles nor subcategories if the nomination below goes through. Only one decade from this century has a category. Delete Hawkestone 01:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Following up all the below here is another category which is unlikely ever to populated as dates from his era are almost always legendary. Delete. Hawkestone 01:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains only Aaron like the category nominated below. The 123 gap is surely enough to condemn both of these categories. Delete. Hawkestone 01:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Aaron's year of birth is not discussed in the article. The date is a traditional one that depends on a religious interpretation of the Bible and does not meet Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and verifiability. Delete. Hawkestone 01:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Delete Hawkestone 01:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nominations below go through. Other early centuries with no articles do not have categories. Delete Hawkestone 01:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains no articles, only the subcategory nominated for deletion below. No other decade of this century has a births category. Delete. Hawkestone 01:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Most likely whatever it contained was moved out as someone considered the date to be insufficiently certain. Delete Hawkestone 01:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be redundant if the category nominated below is deleted. Additions unlikely. Delete Hawkestone 01:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The earliest year of birth but it is the year Sargon of Akkad began to reign, not the year he was born. No-one is likely to be added. Delete . Hawkestone 01:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was already handled per cfd mar 12 2006 debate. Syrthiss 15:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The content is already moved as per discussion in Category talk:Nobel Prize in Economics winners so it's just some housekeeping. // Liftarn
The result of the debate was rename. Syrthiss 14:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The only skiers in the present category are freestyle skiers, as one would expect, given its two sibling categories Category:Cross country skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics and Category:Alpine Skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics (the latter subject to speedy renaming to Category:Alpine skiers at the 2006 Winter Olympics (capitalization)). There are no (snow) skiers other than alpine, cross country and freestyle at the Olympics (or in general). -- Mareklug talk 18:09, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - TexasAndroid 16:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category is duplicting the content of Category:Mountains and hills of Northern Ireland. In the interests of avoiding confusion and consistancy with the other UK mountain categories, I think it should be deleted. Stu ’Bout ye! 16:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
What is the criterion of being famous? Who decides whether a statue is famous or not? It is too arbitrary a criterion for categorisation. --
Ghirla
-трёп- 10:44, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:35, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category of things related to a site that itself has no entry and does not meet WP:WEB (alexa rank 93,000). part of a series of self-serving articles created today by Chaz365; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allah-Kitten controversy. Delete. bikeable (talk) 04:34, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedied already by BorgHunter. Syrthiss 21:11, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply
"Coptography" is a neologism - see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptography. FreplySpang (talk) 04:22, 13 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. Syrthiss 14:37, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nomination below goes through. Probably unpopulatable without breaching neutrality and verifiability by using legendary dates. Delete. Hawkestone 02:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Same arguments apply as for various categories below. Delete Hawkestone 02:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nomination below goes through. Probably unpopulatable without breaching neutrality and verifiability by using legendary dates. Delete Hawkestone 02:04, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty and almost certainly unpopulatable. Most likely contained a legendary birth date which someone (appropriately) moved out. Delete Hawkestone 02:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Missed this one a minute ago. Will be empty if the other nominations go though. Delete Hawkestone 01:58, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will contain neither articles nor subcategories if the nomination below goes through. Only one decade from this century has a category. Delete Hawkestone 01:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Following up all the below here is another category which is unlikely ever to populated as dates from his era are almost always legendary. Delete. Hawkestone 01:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains only Aaron like the category nominated below. The 123 gap is surely enough to condemn both of these categories. Delete. Hawkestone 01:48, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Aaron's year of birth is not discussed in the article. The date is a traditional one that depends on a religious interpretation of the Bible and does not meet Wikipedia's standards of neutrality and verifiability. Delete. Hawkestone 01:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Delete Hawkestone 01:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be empty if the nominations below go through. Other early centuries with no articles do not have categories. Delete Hawkestone 01:42, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Contains no articles, only the subcategory nominated for deletion below. No other decade of this century has a births category. Delete. Hawkestone 01:40, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty. Most likely whatever it contained was moved out as someone considered the date to be insufficiently certain. Delete Hawkestone 01:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Will be redundant if the category nominated below is deleted. Additions unlikely. Delete Hawkestone 01:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Syrthiss 14:44, 22 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The earliest year of birth but it is the year Sargon of Akkad began to reign, not the year he was born. No-one is likely to be added. Delete . Hawkestone 01:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was already handled per cfd mar 12 2006 debate. Syrthiss 15:38, 20 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The content is already moved as per discussion in Category talk:Nobel Prize in Economics winners so it's just some housekeeping. // Liftarn