The result of the debate was Duplicate listing ∞ Who ?¿? 19:54, 19 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Tagged on September 15 by
user:TexasAndroid
[1], but not listed here. —
Insta
ntnood 09:14, 16 September 2005 (UTC) See
below. —
Insta
ntnood 07:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 07:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
We use "in" for settlements and "of" for subdivisions. These are subdivisions. There are separate categories for category:Cities in the Netherlands and category:Towns in the Netherlands. The whole of the Netherlands is divided into municipalities and many of them contain multiple settlements. Rename category:Municipalities of the Netherlands. CalJW 21:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 07:01, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Dungeons & Dragons computer and video games. - Sean Curtin 21:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 07:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Overly restrictive, "nativeness" is a difficult concept to measure. Excludes people who would be covered by more general People from Birmingham i.e. those who have strong links with city but only arrived as adults. No category for such people and naming it would be untidy. Valiantis 21:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
None of the articles in this category are specific to it (save the Wraith: The Oblivion page itself, and all are already listed under its parent category. Supermorff 21:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misspelling. TexasAndroid 19:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 00:16, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Was on CSD with the reason "there are no mountains in Belgium". Not empty, but the one thing in it doesn't sound much like a mountain, so moving here. ~~ N ( t/ c) 19:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete: I changed the name to Communities of Belgium Julien Tuerlinckx 19:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category - TexasAndroid 19:17, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 03:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This category's name is a neologism and therefore acts as original research. It's concept is also novel, alleging a connection between computer science and general relativity which is based on a faulty understanding of relativity theory.
The result of the debate was Not tagged properly (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 00:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat that looks like an attempt at a portal or a Wikibooks entry. Also misCapitaLized. Delete. -- Quuxplusone 18:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete all. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Here we go again. Seven categories this time. All but the last have only a single entry, the singer at the head of the section. Most, if not all of the single-genre categories have more appropriate places that she could be placed in. And Category:Folk has a much more populated category structure in Category:Folk music, down which homes could be found for both entries. As for the double-genre categories, do we really need to start categorizing every time a performer bridges two genres? As previously with these cases, I want to stress that I am *not* submitting the article for deletion, just the categories. - TexasAndroid 18:50, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Capitalization. Someone had used a #REDIRECT to point this to Category:Punk rock groups. Or simply delete the category, it has 0 articles. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category (also applies to Category:M4 Motorway service stations. Can be recreated if articles for this cat are created; otherwise to justify this one there should be a (potentially empty) services category for every motorway in Britain (possibly worldwide?) which would be daft. CLW 05:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category (also applies to Category:M5 Motorway service stations. Can be recreated if articles for this cat are created; otherwise to justify this one there should be a (potentially empty) services category for every motorway in Britain (possibly worldwide?) which would be daft. CLW 05:34, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Duplicate. Merge into category:Kenyan media, which is by far the more common form, and delete CalJW 04:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Abbreviations should be avoided, if nothing else. siafu 02:30, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misnomer. It has been replaced by Category:Mighty Ducks of Anaheim, referencing the official name of the hockey club. ccwaters 01:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misnomer, like above nominee. It has been replaced by Category:Mighty Ducks of Anaheim coaches, referencing the official name of the hockey club. ccwaters 01:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
It should at least be a subcat of Police weapons, but I don't think the number of articles makes it worthwhile. Salsb 00:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Because "Washington, District of Columbia" follows category naming conventions I propose that Category:Washington, D.C. be replaced by Category:District of Columbia and Category:Washington, District of Columbia as appropriate. Due to the overlap between the city and District, some articles will have both categories. These categories encounter the boundaries of several conventions due to Washington having absorbed the District, but still fit within conventions. ( SEWilco 00:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC)) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, was originally a neopaganism subcat, but nothing is in it anymore. Salsb 00:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Duplicate listing ∞ Who ?¿? 19:54, 19 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Tagged on September 15 by
user:TexasAndroid
[1], but not listed here. —
Insta
ntnood 09:14, 16 September 2005 (UTC) See
below. —
Insta
ntnood 07:55, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 07:00, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
We use "in" for settlements and "of" for subdivisions. These are subdivisions. There are separate categories for category:Cities in the Netherlands and category:Towns in the Netherlands. The whole of the Netherlands is divided into municipalities and many of them contain multiple settlements. Rename category:Municipalities of the Netherlands. CalJW 21:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 07:01, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Dungeons & Dragons computer and video games. - Sean Curtin 21:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 07:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Overly restrictive, "nativeness" is a difficult concept to measure. Excludes people who would be covered by more general People from Birmingham i.e. those who have strong links with city but only arrived as adults. No category for such people and naming it would be untidy. Valiantis 21:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:20, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
None of the articles in this category are specific to it (save the Wraith: The Oblivion page itself, and all are already listed under its parent category. Supermorff 21:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:19, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misspelling. TexasAndroid 19:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensus (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 00:16, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Was on CSD with the reason "there are no mountains in Belgium". Not empty, but the one thing in it doesn't sound much like a mountain, so moving here. ~~ N ( t/ c) 19:29, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:13, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Delete: I changed the name to Communities of Belgium Julien Tuerlinckx 19:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category - TexasAndroid 19:17, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 03:18, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
This category's name is a neologism and therefore acts as original research. It's concept is also novel, alleging a connection between computer science and general relativity which is based on a faulty understanding of relativity theory.
The result of the debate was Not tagged properly (no change). ∞ Who ?¿? 00:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty cat that looks like an attempt at a portal or a Wikibooks entry. Also misCapitaLized. Delete. -- Quuxplusone 18:53, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete all. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Here we go again. Seven categories this time. All but the last have only a single entry, the singer at the head of the section. Most, if not all of the single-genre categories have more appropriate places that she could be placed in. And Category:Folk has a much more populated category structure in Category:Folk music, down which homes could be found for both entries. As for the double-genre categories, do we really need to start categorizing every time a performer bridges two genres? As previously with these cases, I want to stress that I am *not* submitting the article for deletion, just the categories. - TexasAndroid 18:50, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. ∞ Who ?¿? 00:09, 22 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Capitalization. Someone had used a #REDIRECT to point this to Category:Punk rock groups. Or simply delete the category, it has 0 articles. Gyrofrog (talk) 18:00, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:31, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category (also applies to Category:M4 Motorway service stations. Can be recreated if articles for this cat are created; otherwise to justify this one there should be a (potentially empty) services category for every motorway in Britain (possibly worldwide?) which would be daft. CLW 05:35, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:29, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category (also applies to Category:M5 Motorway service stations. Can be recreated if articles for this cat are created; otherwise to justify this one there should be a (potentially empty) services category for every motorway in Britain (possibly worldwide?) which would be daft. CLW 05:34, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:27, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Duplicate. Merge into category:Kenyan media, which is by far the more common form, and delete CalJW 04:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Abbreviations should be avoided, if nothing else. siafu 02:30, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:21, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misnomer. It has been replaced by Category:Mighty Ducks of Anaheim, referencing the official name of the hockey club. ccwaters 01:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:19, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Misnomer, like above nominee. It has been replaced by Category:Mighty Ducks of Anaheim coaches, referencing the official name of the hockey club. ccwaters 01:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
It should at least be a subcat of Police weapons, but I don't think the number of articles makes it worthwhile. Salsb 00:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:17, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Because "Washington, District of Columbia" follows category naming conventions I propose that Category:Washington, D.C. be replaced by Category:District of Columbia and Category:Washington, District of Columbia as appropriate. Due to the overlap between the city and District, some articles will have both categories. These categories encounter the boundaries of several conventions due to Washington having absorbed the District, but still fit within conventions. ( SEWilco 00:27, 15 September 2005 (UTC)) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:12, 21 September 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, was originally a neopaganism subcat, but nothing is in it anymore. Salsb 00:12, 15 September 2005 (UTC) reply