The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:27, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename this as Category:Student debating societies, which is the content. Septentrionalis 18:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 12:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category contains two articles, one of which is already in Category:Pseudophysics. Since the other is also a physical theory, I suggest the category be merged into Category:Pseudophysics. (The defining quality of 'pseudophysics' is "have not undergone the critical review process needed in order to be accepted by the scientific community") --- Septentrionalis 15:30, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Is the lack of mainstream approval, touted like a blind butcher ax by the self-appointed judges of the pseudophysics domain, in and of itself, really sufficient to declare science good or pseudo? I think not.
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 12:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I suggest that this cat should be merged with its parent, Category:History by region. They're both a little sparse. -- Brunnock 14:45, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Goth. - Sean Curtin July 4, 2005 00:21 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 12:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Since the definition of a 'major' programming language is arbitrary, this is redundant with Category:Programming languages. R adiant _>|< 12:57, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 12:11, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The Super 12 rugby union competition, which has already been completed for 2005, will resume in 2006 with two new teams and a new name, Super 14. There was already a Super 14 teams category which had the two new teams; I moved all the Super 12 teams over to the Super 14 category. Dale Arnett 10:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Vandalism -- Jerry Crimson Mann 06:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Has only 1 article and likely to stay that way. Superfluous. Separate category Category:Domestic cricket competitions is a catch all. Ian ≡ talk 04:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 12:08, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Not a word. Use "psychokinetics" instead. - Sean Curtin 03:42, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 12:02, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Religious what? Category:Religious workers exists, suggesting that this become Category:Fictional clergy and religious workers. - Sean Curtin 03:42, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This is more consistent with the custom of categorizing articles as "Compositions by Foo", rather than "Foo Compositions". For more information, see Category Talk: Compositions by composer and Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 June 11#Mozart symphonies. NatusRoma 02:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Three more:
NatusRoma 04:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Athletes at the 2004 Summer Olympics, name is inconsistent with related categories, empty. -- Jonel | Speak 02:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category was recently orphaned by mistake. In the mean time History of Cinema was renamed History of film and Category:Cinema was renamed Category:Film. -- Samuel Wantman 01:30, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category was recently made into an orphan because it was replaced by Category:Final Fantasy minigames. Because of this, Category:Final Fantasy subgames will no longer be used, and therefore shall be deleted. -- ZeWrestler 16:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:27, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename this as Category:Student debating societies, which is the content. Septentrionalis 18:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 12:33, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category contains two articles, one of which is already in Category:Pseudophysics. Since the other is also a physical theory, I suggest the category be merged into Category:Pseudophysics. (The defining quality of 'pseudophysics' is "have not undergone the critical review process needed in order to be accepted by the scientific community") --- Septentrionalis 15:30, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Is the lack of mainstream approval, touted like a blind butcher ax by the self-appointed judges of the pseudophysics domain, in and of itself, really sufficient to declare science good or pseudo? I think not.
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 12:18, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I suggest that this cat should be merged with its parent, Category:History by region. They're both a little sparse. -- Brunnock 14:45, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Goth. - Sean Curtin July 4, 2005 00:21 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 12:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Since the definition of a 'major' programming language is arbitrary, this is redundant with Category:Programming languages. R adiant _>|< 12:57, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 12:11, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The Super 12 rugby union competition, which has already been completed for 2005, will resume in 2006 with two new teams and a new name, Super 14. There was already a Super 14 teams category which had the two new teams; I moved all the Super 12 teams over to the Super 14 category. Dale Arnett 10:38, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Vandalism -- Jerry Crimson Mann 06:53, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 12:10, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Has only 1 article and likely to stay that way. Superfluous. Separate category Category:Domestic cricket competitions is a catch all. Ian ≡ talk 04:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 12:08, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Not a word. Use "psychokinetics" instead. - Sean Curtin 03:42, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 12:02, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Religious what? Category:Religious workers exists, suggesting that this become Category:Fictional clergy and religious workers. - Sean Curtin 03:42, July 11, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This is more consistent with the custom of categorizing articles as "Compositions by Foo", rather than "Foo Compositions". For more information, see Category Talk: Compositions by composer and Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 June 11#Mozart symphonies. NatusRoma 02:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Three more:
NatusRoma 04:47, 12 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:53, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Athletes at the 2004 Summer Olympics, name is inconsistent with related categories, empty. -- Jonel | Speak 02:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category was recently orphaned by mistake. In the mean time History of Cinema was renamed History of film and Category:Cinema was renamed Category:Film. -- Samuel Wantman 01:30, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This category was recently made into an orphan because it was replaced by Category:Final Fantasy minigames. Because of this, Category:Final Fantasy subgames will no longer be used, and therefore shall be deleted. -- ZeWrestler 16:08, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply