The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:17, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Same thing as for Category:Free Linux software, which has been proposed for deletion too. Many software here are not specifically for Mac OS, plus Free software tend to be multi-OS. All of the arguments given for Category:Free Linux software apply here too. -- Khalid hassani 19:02, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 14:22, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I would like to see this changed to the more conventional category:Retailers of the United Kingdom. category:British supermarkets can then become a subcategory. Bhoeble 18:07, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge -- Kbdank71 14:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Deliberative procedure is not a commonly used term; and I was unable to find it in any dictionary, while the term parliamentary law is widely accepted. The creator of this category may have been confused, not realizing that it is actually deliberative assemblies that use parliamentary procedures. A Parliamentary Procedure is a combination of the Common Law of Parliamentary Procedure plus a deliberative assembly's rules of order. Parliamentary law is a branch of Common Law. Squideshi 14:25, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:15, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
An unnecessary sub-cat. Towns are already categorised in Category:Towns by country. JW 11:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 14:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Should be renamed as Category:Korean loanwords as per other categories in Category:English words of foreign origin. This might apply to some of the other terminolgy-by-language categories as well, since most of them dont even contain "terminology" at all.-- Huaiwei 10:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Resolution of policy disputes is done through RFC, AN or similar mechanisms. This category is redundant with those, and also unused and unlinked. R adiant _>|< 08:51, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I realize similar categories have been up for deletion and haven't obtained any sort of consensus ( example), but I believe a category like this is absolutely not needed - moreso for the Razzies than the Oscars. Read the link above and comments by Rick Block. I agree with most, if not all, of what he's saying. K1Bond007 03:38, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:45, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category and sounds like it was created by someone with a POV mission. -- Necrothesp 23:52, 6 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 13:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
There are a total of 11 entries, most of which are already listed in Wicked (novel) and the rest of which could well be. For the matter of that, most of these articles could well be merged into Wicked (novel). Delete and relist any contents in Category:Fictional characters. DES (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:17, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Same thing as for Category:Free Linux software, which has been proposed for deletion too. Many software here are not specifically for Mac OS, plus Free software tend to be multi-OS. All of the arguments given for Category:Free Linux software apply here too. -- Khalid hassani 19:02, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 14:22, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I would like to see this changed to the more conventional category:Retailers of the United Kingdom. category:British supermarkets can then become a subcategory. Bhoeble 18:07, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge -- Kbdank71 14:20, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Deliberative procedure is not a commonly used term; and I was unable to find it in any dictionary, while the term parliamentary law is widely accepted. The creator of this category may have been confused, not realizing that it is actually deliberative assemblies that use parliamentary procedures. A Parliamentary Procedure is a combination of the Common Law of Parliamentary Procedure plus a deliberative assembly's rules of order. Parliamentary law is a branch of Common Law. Squideshi 14:25, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:15, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
An unnecessary sub-cat. Towns are already categorised in Category:Towns by country. JW 11:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 14:12, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Should be renamed as Category:Korean loanwords as per other categories in Category:English words of foreign origin. This might apply to some of the other terminolgy-by-language categories as well, since most of them dont even contain "terminology" at all.-- Huaiwei 10:39, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:06, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Resolution of policy disputes is done through RFC, AN or similar mechanisms. This category is redundant with those, and also unused and unlinked. R adiant _>|< 08:51, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:59, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
I realize similar categories have been up for deletion and haven't obtained any sort of consensus ( example), but I believe a category like this is absolutely not needed - moreso for the Razzies than the Oscars. Read the link above and comments by Rick Block. I agree with most, if not all, of what he's saying. K1Bond007 03:38, August 7, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 13:45, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty category and sounds like it was created by someone with a POV mission. -- Necrothesp 23:52, 6 August 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge -- Kbdank71 13:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC) reply
There are a total of 11 entries, most of which are already listed in Wicked (novel) and the rest of which could well be. For the matter of that, most of these articles could well be merged into Wicked (novel). Delete and relist any contents in Category:Fictional characters. DES (talk) 00:38, 7 August 2005 (UTC) reply