The result of the debate was Delete. WinHunter ( talk) 02:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hollywood Supporters of the Democratic Party ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was Rename. WinHunter ( talk) 05:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Category:Famous temples of Rajasthan to Category:Temples in Rajasthan reply
The result of the debate was Delete. WinHunter ( talk) 02:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Category:Polish resistance operations has been replaced by Category:Polish resistance during World War II reply
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 16:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous people from Piedmont to Category:People from Piedmont, California
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 16:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Articles that do not belong in this category ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus on what to rename to, renominate if desired -- Kbdank71 17:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:The 198 Files ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was marked and protected -- Kbdank71 17:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Leaders of China ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Only 2 album releases to date, not enough releases to warrant a category of its own. -- Longhair 15:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This artist was the winner of the first Australian Idol television series and has released only 2 albums to date, not enough releases to warrant a category of its own. -- Longhair 15:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. the wub "?!" 17:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was do nothing. Categories have now been listed for over two weeks without having been tagged. -- Kbdank71 16:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Writing systems categories ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Includes all of these. Some have not been created yet but are listed to be at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Writing systems
The result of the debate was rename/merge to Category:Reformed church theological colleges and seminaries -- Kbdank71 17:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Reformed seminaries and theological colleges to Category:Reformed Church seminaries and theological colleges
I agree. This re-naming makes good sense to be clearer. However, we probably do need a cat. for places like Moore College which is Anglican but also identifies as Reformed (in the broader sense of the word). Cor Unum 11:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There is no Reformed Church however, and that's misleading about the title. I agree that the ambiguity of it all should be cleared up, as any Protestant denomination can claim to be reformed. However, I would suggest such a disambiguation in including the keyword "Theological" before seminaries. This shows that the category is referring to seminaries that teach Reformed Theology, rather than alluding to a non-existant Reformed Church. Therefore, I propose the category be renamed to Category:Reformed theological seminaries and colleges. I remove the "theological" from before "colleges" as it would be redundant and it's made apparent earlier in the category name that reformed theological institutes is what we are referring to. Regards, Shazbot85 Talk 15:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Half-time summary: four days into the seven day debate, I would summarize the consensus as:
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 07:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep; cfd isn't needed to recategorize a category. -- Kbdank71 16:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Australian conservationists into Category:Conservationists
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 16:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis renamed to Category:Sega Mega Drive & Category:Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis games renamed to Category:Sega Mega Drive games per consensus at Talk:Sega_Mega_Drive#Proposed_move. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 07:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already merged -- Kbdank71 16:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Halloween attractions into Category:Halloween traditions
The result of the debate was Delete. WinHunter ( talk) 02:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hollywood Supporters of the Democratic Party ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was Rename. WinHunter ( talk) 05:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Category:Famous temples of Rajasthan to Category:Temples in Rajasthan reply
The result of the debate was Delete. WinHunter ( talk) 02:08, 13 September 2006 (UTC) Category:Polish resistance operations has been replaced by Category:Polish resistance during World War II reply
The result of the debate was rename Tim! 16:33, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous people from Piedmont to Category:People from Piedmont, California
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 16:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Articles that do not belong in this category ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus on what to rename to, renominate if desired -- Kbdank71 17:39, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:The 198 Files ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was marked and protected -- Kbdank71 17:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Leaders of China ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:32, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Only 2 album releases to date, not enough releases to warrant a category of its own. -- Longhair 15:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
This artist was the winner of the first Australian Idol television series and has released only 2 albums to date, not enough releases to warrant a category of its own. -- Longhair 15:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn. the wub "?!" 17:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was do nothing. Categories have now been listed for over two weeks without having been tagged. -- Kbdank71 16:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Writing systems categories ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Includes all of these. Some have not been created yet but are listed to be at Wikipedia:Userboxes/Writing systems
The result of the debate was rename/merge to Category:Reformed church theological colleges and seminaries -- Kbdank71 17:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Reformed seminaries and theological colleges to Category:Reformed Church seminaries and theological colleges
I agree. This re-naming makes good sense to be clearer. However, we probably do need a cat. for places like Moore College which is Anglican but also identifies as Reformed (in the broader sense of the word). Cor Unum 11:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
There is no Reformed Church however, and that's misleading about the title. I agree that the ambiguity of it all should be cleared up, as any Protestant denomination can claim to be reformed. However, I would suggest such a disambiguation in including the keyword "Theological" before seminaries. This shows that the category is referring to seminaries that teach Reformed Theology, rather than alluding to a non-existant Reformed Church. Therefore, I propose the category be renamed to Category:Reformed theological seminaries and colleges. I remove the "theological" from before "colleges" as it would be redundant and it's made apparent earlier in the category name that reformed theological institutes is what we are referring to. Regards, Shazbot85 Talk 15:14, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Half-time summary: four days into the seven day debate, I would summarize the consensus as:
-- Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) ( Talk) 07:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep; cfd isn't needed to recategorize a category. -- Kbdank71 16:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Australian conservationists into Category:Conservationists
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 16:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis renamed to Category:Sega Mega Drive & Category:Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis games renamed to Category:Sega Mega Drive games per consensus at Talk:Sega_Mega_Drive#Proposed_move. ˉˉ anetode ╦╩ 07:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already merged -- Kbdank71 16:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Halloween attractions into Category:Halloween traditions