< October 30 | November 1 > |
---|
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Same reasons as Category:Leeds United AFC (below) so I propose to following category below:
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Since the Leeds United article has changed from Leeds United AFC to Leeds United A.F.C. it makes sense to move the categories related to this club to have the suffix A.F.C. instead of the old AFC so I propose moving following categories below:
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hungarian-born people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. I cannot see what this category is supposed to be in relation to
Category:Hungarian people (of which it is... a subcategory). What is the precedent here? It looks like a subjective creation according to some obscure criteria. Its purpose other than listing Hungarians in Hungary (just as
Category:Hungarian people) is to list
Category:People of Hungarian descent. Meaningless, and potentially POV.
Dahn 22:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete after properly recategorizing the remaining articles to 'Category:Hungarian people' plus 'Category:People of Hungarian descent' or one of the latter's subcategories. Hmains 04:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:IBM omnibus (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anti-hero (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Empty cat. Already covered by
Category:Fictional anti-heroes
Pascal.Tesson 17:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
David Kernow (
talk) 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fuck (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
The result of the debate was delete (empty). David Kernow ( talk) 04:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Television stations in Eau Claire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Dubious value to start with, but in any case empty and subsumed by
Television stations in La Crosse and Eau Claire.
Pascal.Tesson 16:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete all. David Kernow ( talk) 04:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was } delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Husbands of Elizabeth Taylor (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. Is this a defining characteristic? Besides, it is now an orphan category.
RobertG ♬
talk 12:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Celebrity Roleplayers/Wargamers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, another hobby category of celebrities. As the nominator of
Category:Celebrity Gamers said, "Categorisation by hobby is not useful or significant."
Percy Snoodle 12:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow ( talk) 04:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Canadian pundits into Category:Canadian political pundits
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Terrorists (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The categories breaks WP:WTA as it labels individuals as terrorists from an editorial voice. I would propose either deleting them altogether (as my first choice) or renaming and re-organising (into several categories, such as 'Self confessed terrorists', 'People defined as terrorist by the UN' etc...). Localzuk (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Roman Catholic Ministries-Roman Catholic Lay Societies to
Category:Roman Catholic Associations of the Faithful or
Category:Associations of the Faithful
The result of the debate was delete and block. David Kernow ( talk) 04:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:People with facial hair (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Res ipsa loquitur.
Postdlf 04:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Chief Dark Lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, utterly pointless category. "Chief Dark Lords" is not standard nomenclature for any class of fictional villan.
TCC
(talk)
(contribs) 04:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow ( talk) 03:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Ganguly Family Connection to Category:Ganguly Family (film)
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow ( talk) 03:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Music teachers redirected to Music educators. David Kernow ( talk) 03:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete (it's empty). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Black lawyers to Category:African American lawyers
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dragonlance templates (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Dragonlance templates is redundant to Category:WikiProject Dragonlance templates. Must have been overlooked when the WikiProject was created. Dooms Day 349 Happy Halloween! 00:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
< October 30 | November 1 > |
---|
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Same reasons as Category:Leeds United AFC (below) so I propose to following category below:
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Since the Leeds United article has changed from Leeds United AFC to Leeds United A.F.C. it makes sense to move the categories related to this club to have the suffix A.F.C. instead of the old AFC so I propose moving following categories below:
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Hungarian-born people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. I cannot see what this category is supposed to be in relation to
Category:Hungarian people (of which it is... a subcategory). What is the precedent here? It looks like a subjective creation according to some obscure criteria. Its purpose other than listing Hungarians in Hungary (just as
Category:Hungarian people) is to list
Category:People of Hungarian descent. Meaningless, and potentially POV.
Dahn 22:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete after properly recategorizing the remaining articles to 'Category:Hungarian people' plus 'Category:People of Hungarian descent' or one of the latter's subcategories. Hmains 04:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:IBM omnibus (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:14, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Anti-hero (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Empty cat. Already covered by
Category:Fictional anti-heroes
Pascal.Tesson 17:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
David Kernow (
talk) 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Category:Fuck (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
reply
The result of the debate was delete (empty). David Kernow ( talk) 04:10, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Television stations in Eau Claire (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Dubious value to start with, but in any case empty and subsumed by
Television stations in La Crosse and Eau Claire.
Pascal.Tesson 16:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete all. David Kernow ( talk) 04:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was } delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:06, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Husbands of Elizabeth Taylor (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete. Is this a defining characteristic? Besides, it is now an orphan category.
RobertG ♬
talk 12:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 04:05, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Celebrity Roleplayers/Wargamers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, another hobby category of celebrities. As the nominator of
Category:Celebrity Gamers said, "Categorisation by hobby is not useful or significant."
Percy Snoodle 12:26, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow ( talk) 04:03, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Canadian pundits into Category:Canadian political pundits
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Terrorists (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The categories breaks WP:WTA as it labels individuals as terrorists from an editorial voice. I would propose either deleting them altogether (as my first choice) or renaming and re-organising (into several categories, such as 'Self confessed terrorists', 'People defined as terrorist by the UN' etc...). Localzuk (talk) 10:38, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Roman Catholic Ministries-Roman Catholic Lay Societies to
Category:Roman Catholic Associations of the Faithful or
Category:Associations of the Faithful
The result of the debate was delete and block. David Kernow ( talk) 04:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:People with facial hair (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Res ipsa loquitur.
Postdlf 04:47, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Chief Dark Lords (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, utterly pointless category. "Chief Dark Lords" is not standard nomenclature for any class of fictional villan.
TCC
(talk)
(contribs) 04:01, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow ( talk) 03:54, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Ganguly Family Connection to Category:Ganguly Family (film)
The result of the debate was category already deleted. David Kernow ( talk) 03:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Music teachers redirected to Music educators. David Kernow ( talk) 03:59, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete (it's empty). -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Black lawyers to Category:African American lawyers
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Dragonlance templates (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Dragonlance templates is redundant to Category:WikiProject Dragonlance templates. Must have been overlooked when the WikiProject was created. Dooms Day 349 Happy Halloween! 00:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply