< October 23 | October 25 > |
---|
The result of the debate was speedy rename per nom. David Kernow ( talk) 12:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:2006 in the American Le Mans Series. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:2006 in ALMS to Category:2006 in American Le Mans Series
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:U.S. State Attorneys General to Category:State Attorneys General in the United States
The result of the debate was rename all.
the wub
"?!" 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:World War II South Pacific Campaign (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete This category appears to be covered by categories for
Category:World_War_II_Pacific_Campaign and for
Category:Far_East_naval_theatre_of_World_War_II. There are no actual entries in this category. --
Sm8900 19:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)19:50, 24 October 2006 .
reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect.
the wub
"?!" 11:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was upmerge to
Category:Internet television series.
the wub
"?!" 11:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Lists of webisodes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Webcast webisodic series (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
After very lengthy discussion during this vote, it was decided that the singular "Collection" is preferable to the plural "Collections". The rationale in a nutshell: the singular case is better because the category is for articles such as Night Watch (painting) etc., as opposed to, say, Hope Entomological Collections. It is for objects that form the constituent parts of a collection, and not for "collections" per se; this confusion had arisen because of the plural. That last vote successfully implemented the change on Category:Collection of the British Museum; my hope is that it will now be implemented across the board.
NB: There may be an argument for keeping the plural in the case of "National Museums of Scotland", "National Galleries of Scotland", and "Vatican Museums"; in each of those cases we are talking not of a single museum, but several. The question is whether we consider that e.g. the Vatican Museums have a single collection dispersed across several museums (in which case, Rename) or that each of its museums constitutes a collection in itself (in which case, Keep). Please consider this when voting. talk to the HAM 18:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Adult Spin-offs to
Category:Adult spin-offs
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wario characters into Category:Mario characters
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
All are duplicated categories. Category:Mongooses in fiction was already nominated, yesterday. — AnemoneProj e ctors ( talk) 16:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Mongooses in fiction (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
A category created today that duplicates Fictional mongooses.
Graham
talk/
mail/
e 21:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to bring into conformance with the usual WP:MILHIST naming convention for such categories. Kirill Lokshin 16:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn -- Kbdank71 19:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:World War II Pacific Campaign to Category:World War II North-Central Pacific Campaign
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:World War II operations and battles of the Pacific Theatre (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete - empty category (removed aerial operations subcategory, placed in ..ops and battles of Pacific Campaign).
User:Sm8900 15:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose.Yes, I'm opposing my own proposal. i just figured out a good way to use this category. We can use this category to collect all regional campaign subcategories which have this topic. View the category to see what i mean. Thanks. -- Sm8900 13:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Former Muslims (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
An anon tried to delete this by blanking it, and was reverted by AntiVandalBot. They left a message on AntiVandalBot's talk page, and I think they have somewhat of a point. Following are some quotes from their message: "a page that held religiouly charged views of a violent nature", "I ... attempted to delete en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Muslims but your bot has prevented that. I'm left with no choice but to report that wiki is allowing itself to host what could be a terrorist hit list." and their edit summary, "if i see this up agan , i'll forward it to homSec as a terrorist hit list" (sic on all of those) ~
ONUnicorn (
Talk /
Contribs) 20:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Nick Fury films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Captain America films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Iron Man films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film and it's not even made yet. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Avengers films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
They only have two films. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Just because the characters the films are based on are notable does not mean they should each have their own category. They should all be merged into their parent category.
reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sport in Palestine to Category:Palestinian sports per examples like Category:Palestinian politics and the rationale explained in [1] with Palestine being a confusing inappropriate term. Also sub sections Category:Football in Palestine to Category:Palestinian football and Category:Football venues in Palestine to Category:Palestinian football venues accordingly. Amoruso 12:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Hawkestone 23:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Activists of Taiwan independence movement to Category:Taiwan independence activists
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British capitals to Category:Capital cities in the United Kingdom
"...Seats of government in major substate jurisdictions are often called "capitals", but this is typically the case only in countries with some degree of federalism ... For example, the seat of government in a state of the United States of America is usually called its "capital", but the main city in a region of England is usually not..."
— Capital article
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Human diseases (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Creates an unnecessary hierarchy under
Category:Diseases (diseases should be human unless stated otherwise). Has the capability of causing category creep.
JFW |
T@lk 05:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 18:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fefe Dobson (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
A separate category for
Fefe Dobson? There's no reason to believe that this is necessary, and the fact that the category only contains one article would appear to suggest that there is no reason to do it. --
Nlu (
talk) 05:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Relatives of celebrities (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This is a silly category that could be expanded vastly but to no purpose.
Wilchett 03:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Doctoral degree holders (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This embraces most modern academics and many other people, so it is a worthless category.
Sumahoy 03:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename - will someone please nominate Category:VVD and Category:D66 per C mon? -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:PvdA to Category:Labour Party (Netherlands)
The result of the debate was rename -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Arnim to Category:Arnim family
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Free forum hosts to Category:Forum hosting
The result of the debate was delete both.
the wub
"?!" 13:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Latter Day Saint athletes to
Category:Latter Day Saints sportspeople or for deletion.
Category:Hindu athletes for deletion
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 18:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The five stub articles which were in here have now been merged into one article. As such, this is now redundant. Grutness... wha? 01:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 18:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
< October 23 | October 25 > |
---|
The result of the debate was speedy rename per nom. David Kernow ( talk) 12:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:2006 in the American Le Mans Series. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:2006 in ALMS to Category:2006 in American Le Mans Series
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:19, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:U.S. State Attorneys General to Category:State Attorneys General in the United States
The result of the debate was rename all.
the wub
"?!" 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:World War II South Pacific Campaign (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete This category appears to be covered by categories for
Category:World_War_II_Pacific_Campaign and for
Category:Far_East_naval_theatre_of_World_War_II. There are no actual entries in this category. --
Sm8900 19:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)19:50, 24 October 2006 .
reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect.
the wub
"?!" 11:27, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was upmerge to
Category:Internet television series.
the wub
"?!" 11:30, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Lists of webisodes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Webcast webisodic series (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
After very lengthy discussion during this vote, it was decided that the singular "Collection" is preferable to the plural "Collections". The rationale in a nutshell: the singular case is better because the category is for articles such as Night Watch (painting) etc., as opposed to, say, Hope Entomological Collections. It is for objects that form the constituent parts of a collection, and not for "collections" per se; this confusion had arisen because of the plural. That last vote successfully implemented the change on Category:Collection of the British Museum; my hope is that it will now be implemented across the board.
NB: There may be an argument for keeping the plural in the case of "National Museums of Scotland", "National Galleries of Scotland", and "Vatican Museums"; in each of those cases we are talking not of a single museum, but several. The question is whether we consider that e.g. the Vatican Museums have a single collection dispersed across several museums (in which case, Rename) or that each of its museums constitutes a collection in itself (in which case, Keep). Please consider this when voting. talk to the HAM 18:56, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete.
the wub
"?!" 11:36, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Adult Spin-offs to
Category:Adult spin-offs
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wario characters into Category:Mario characters
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:33, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
All are duplicated categories. Category:Mongooses in fiction was already nominated, yesterday. — AnemoneProj e ctors ( talk) 16:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Mongooses in fiction (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
A category created today that duplicates Fictional mongooses.
Graham
talk/
mail/
e 21:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename to bring into conformance with the usual WP:MILHIST naming convention for such categories. Kirill Lokshin 16:26, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was withdrawn -- Kbdank71 19:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:World War II Pacific Campaign to Category:World War II North-Central Pacific Campaign
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:World War II operations and battles of the Pacific Theatre (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete - empty category (removed aerial operations subcategory, placed in ..ops and battles of Pacific Campaign).
User:Sm8900 15:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Oppose.Yes, I'm opposing my own proposal. i just figured out a good way to use this category. We can use this category to collect all regional campaign subcategories which have this topic. View the category to see what i mean. Thanks. -- Sm8900 13:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:16, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:14, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Former Muslims (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
An anon tried to delete this by blanking it, and was reverted by AntiVandalBot. They left a message on AntiVandalBot's talk page, and I think they have somewhat of a point. Following are some quotes from their message: "a page that held religiouly charged views of a violent nature", "I ... attempted to delete en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Former_Muslims but your bot has prevented that. I'm left with no choice but to report that wiki is allowing itself to host what could be a terrorist hit list." and their edit summary, "if i see this up agan , i'll forward it to homSec as a terrorist hit list" (sic on all of those) ~
ONUnicorn (
Talk /
Contribs) 20:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Nick Fury films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:08, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Captain America films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Iron Man films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
He only has one film and it's not even made yet. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Avengers films (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
They only have two films. ~
Zythe
Talk to me! 14:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Just because the characters the films are based on are notable does not mean they should each have their own category. They should all be merged into their parent category.
reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 19:05, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Sport in Palestine to Category:Palestinian sports per examples like Category:Palestinian politics and the rationale explained in [1] with Palestine being a confusing inappropriate term. Also sub sections Category:Football in Palestine to Category:Palestinian football and Category:Football venues in Palestine to Category:Palestinian football venues accordingly. Amoruso 12:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Hawkestone 23:01, 25 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Activists of Taiwan independence movement to Category:Taiwan independence activists
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 19:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British capitals to Category:Capital cities in the United Kingdom
"...Seats of government in major substate jurisdictions are often called "capitals", but this is typically the case only in countries with some degree of federalism ... For example, the seat of government in a state of the United States of America is usually called its "capital", but the main city in a region of England is usually not..."
— Capital article
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Human diseases (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Creates an unnecessary hierarchy under
Category:Diseases (diseases should be human unless stated otherwise). Has the capability of causing category creep.
JFW |
T@lk 05:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 18:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fefe Dobson (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
A separate category for
Fefe Dobson? There's no reason to believe that this is necessary, and the fact that the category only contains one article would appear to suggest that there is no reason to do it. --
Nlu (
talk) 05:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:04, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Relatives of celebrities (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This is a silly category that could be expanded vastly but to no purpose.
Wilchett 03:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Doctoral degree holders (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
This embraces most modern academics and many other people, so it is a worthless category.
Sumahoy 03:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename - will someone please nominate Category:VVD and Category:D66 per C mon? -- RobertG ♬ talk 10:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:PvdA to Category:Labour Party (Netherlands)
The result of the debate was rename -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Arnim to Category:Arnim family
The result of the debate was rename. -- RobertG ♬ talk 09:49, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Free forum hosts to Category:Forum hosting
The result of the debate was delete both.
the wub
"?!" 13:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Latter Day Saint athletes to
Category:Latter Day Saints sportspeople or for deletion.
Category:Hindu athletes for deletion
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 18:55, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The five stub articles which were in here have now been merged into one article. As such, this is now redundant. Grutness... wha? 01:10, 24 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 18:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply