< October 12 | October 14 > |
---|
The result of the debate was Delete. Clear consensus to delete formed in the below debate and per comments at the previous debate. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Serbian and Montenegrin footballers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category is redundant to
Category:Serbian footballers and
Category:Montenegrin footballers. The previous cfd,
here, decided to keep it until split. I've finished splitting it, so it is time to delete.
Picaroon9288 22:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete. The consensus formed here feels the category is superfluous to French people. Although the process was interfered with, I think a quick glance through the contributions of the category emptier would allow a precis of what the category contained, and given only one user felt that was an impediment, I don't see that as an obstruction to closing the debate. 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Hiding Talk
Category:Individuals in the history of France (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete: it strikes me as extremely weird and vague criterion for categorizing, and it is unmatched by any subcategory in other counties' "history of" categories. It also looks like it has been created without paying attention to its possible consequences: I am willing to bet that three quarters of articles in the category French people can go in there. The precedent created here is unmanagable. Or at the very least rename to "People in the history of France".
Dahn 22:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename, consensus below and here. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No Consensus - Rename and relist. I can see a strong move to delete, but I think there's a general agreement that this whole issue should be settled with discussion on all the categories in Category:Skeptics rather than simply take one out of the chain. So am renaming per our spelling usage conventions, but relisting as part of an umbrella nomination. This close should not be taken as endorsement of the category or a keep. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British skeptics to Category:British sceptics
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fauna of the United States by state (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Fauna of the United States really is enough. Up to 50 categories in a single article is beyond useful. See Puma for an example, and there are just 14 of them in there! And, if we have the fauna by US states category, why not start a similar categories for the fauna by Bundesländer? This just isn't useful. -- Conti| ✉ 19:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The number of them (by necessity) does not make them or anything else 'not useful'. Also, wasn't the same or similar deletion proposal on flora or fauna of the US states just defeated a couple of weeks ago? Hmains 20:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
"Edit the category. Add one of the following tags at the top of the category text of every category to be deleted or renamed." Hmains 16:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 01:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous American Military Defeats (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
POV cat with little content and little room for expansion
PPGMD 19:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 02:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Criminal suspects (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This category is too vague and potentially too large. There's no definition for "suspect", and law enforcement agencies don't necessarily release lists of suspects so it is difficult to verify. Anyone who has ever been questioned by investigators or accused in the press could be included.
Will Beback 18:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Perhaps it should be redefined. I intended it to cover people who are being investigated for crimes in current events, not anyone who has ever done something wrong. -- Afed 03:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Escorts (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Lewis and Clark Expedition. Vegaswikian 05:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Lewis and Clark to Category:Lewis and Clark expedition
Category:Lewis and Clark to Category:Lewis and Clark Expedition to match the article and to match capitalization rules Hmains 20:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep (cf also #National Parks discussion below). David Kernow ( talk) 02:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Low Saxon into Category:Low German
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:E-RPG System (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete Category created to house adverts for the game system's component sourcebooks - now empty except for the
E-RPG System article.
Percy Snoodle 12:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous redheads (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, Redundant to
List of redheads, which, though in need of cleanup, can be much better defined and therefore avoid POV. Also, only one person was added to it.
Shannernanner 12:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Estudios Churubusco films
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
A rename to bring these in line with the other categories in Category:Films by studio, Category:Paramount films, Category:United Artists films, Category:New Line Cinema films etc. "Films by..." isn't appropriate in these cases as the categories include many films distributed, but not produced by these companies. London Films is a slight exception, because "London Films films" wouldn't make sense. JW 12:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Norms (mathematics). David Kernow ( talk) 01:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 01:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Songs heard at Kansas City Chiefs home games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, this is an extremely trivial characteristic and also unverifiable.
musicpvm 10:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow ( talk) 02:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:RPG Series to Category:Computer and video role-playing game series
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow ( talk) 02:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:College football defunct bowls to Category:Defunct college football bowls
The result of the debate was Rename all to variations of Category:National parks in Foo. Everyone noted that the P should be lower case in Parks but also that "in" was preferred to "of". Hiding Talk 18:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete Clear consensus below and in previous cfd debates. Hiding Talk 18:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
per respect of English grammar. Pascal.Tesson 21:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Opposed. No consensus for the proposed rename, in fact a clear consensus to keep the current name. Hiding Talk 18:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category: United States Courts of Appeals judges to Category: United States circuit judges
The result of the debate was Rename. No objections noted below. Hiding Talk 18:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:WikiProject Reference pages to Category:WikiProject Contents pages
< October 12 | October 14 > |
---|
The result of the debate was Delete. Clear consensus to delete formed in the below debate and per comments at the previous debate. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Serbian and Montenegrin footballers (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category is redundant to
Category:Serbian footballers and
Category:Montenegrin footballers. The previous cfd,
here, decided to keep it until split. I've finished splitting it, so it is time to delete.
Picaroon9288 22:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete. The consensus formed here feels the category is superfluous to French people. Although the process was interfered with, I think a quick glance through the contributions of the category emptier would allow a precis of what the category contained, and given only one user felt that was an impediment, I don't see that as an obstruction to closing the debate. 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) Hiding Talk
Category:Individuals in the history of France (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete: it strikes me as extremely weird and vague criterion for categorizing, and it is unmatched by any subcategory in other counties' "history of" categories. It also looks like it has been created without paying attention to its possible consequences: I am willing to bet that three quarters of articles in the category French people can go in there. The precedent created here is unmanagable. Or at the very least rename to "People in the history of France".
Dahn 22:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Rename, consensus below and here. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No Consensus - Rename and relist. I can see a strong move to delete, but I think there's a general agreement that this whole issue should be settled with discussion on all the categories in Category:Skeptics rather than simply take one out of the chain. So am renaming per our spelling usage conventions, but relisting as part of an umbrella nomination. This close should not be taken as endorsement of the category or a keep. Hiding Talk 10:32, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British skeptics to Category:British sceptics
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:02, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fauna of the United States by state (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Fauna of the United States really is enough. Up to 50 categories in a single article is beyond useful. See Puma for an example, and there are just 14 of them in there! And, if we have the fauna by US states category, why not start a similar categories for the fauna by Bundesländer? This just isn't useful. -- Conti| ✉ 19:33, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The number of them (by necessity) does not make them or anything else 'not useful'. Also, wasn't the same or similar deletion proposal on flora or fauna of the US states just defeated a couple of weeks ago? Hmains 20:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
"Edit the category. Add one of the following tags at the top of the category text of every category to be deleted or renamed." Hmains 16:50, 14 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 01:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous American Military Defeats (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
POV cat with little content and little room for expansion
PPGMD 19:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 02:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Criminal suspects (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, This category is too vague and potentially too large. There's no definition for "suspect", and law enforcement agencies don't necessarily release lists of suspects so it is difficult to verify. Anyone who has ever been questioned by investigators or accused in the press could be included.
Will Beback 18:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
Perhaps it should be redefined. I intended it to cover people who are being investigated for crimes in current events, not anyone who has ever done something wrong. -- Afed 03:16, 14 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Escorts (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was Rename to Category:Lewis and Clark Expedition. Vegaswikian 05:38, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Lewis and Clark to Category:Lewis and Clark expedition
Category:Lewis and Clark to Category:Lewis and Clark Expedition to match the article and to match capitalization rules Hmains 20:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep (cf also #National Parks discussion below). David Kernow ( talk) 02:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Low Saxon into Category:Low German
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:E-RPG System (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete Category created to house adverts for the game system's component sourcebooks - now empty except for the
E-RPG System article.
Percy Snoodle 12:47, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Famous redheads (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, Redundant to
List of redheads, which, though in need of cleanup, can be much better defined and therefore avoid POV. Also, only one person was added to it.
Shannernanner 12:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:17, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Estudios Churubusco films
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC) reply
A rename to bring these in line with the other categories in Category:Films by studio, Category:Paramount films, Category:United Artists films, Category:New Line Cinema films etc. "Films by..." isn't appropriate in these cases as the categories include many films distributed, but not produced by these companies. London Films is a slight exception, because "London Films films" wouldn't make sense. JW 12:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Norms (mathematics). David Kernow ( talk) 01:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow ( talk) 01:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Songs heard at Kansas City Chiefs home games (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, this is an extremely trivial characteristic and also unverifiable.
musicpvm 10:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow ( talk) 02:03, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:RPG Series to Category:Computer and video role-playing game series
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow ( talk) 02:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:College football defunct bowls to Category:Defunct college football bowls
The result of the debate was Rename all to variations of Category:National parks in Foo. Everyone noted that the P should be lower case in Parks but also that "in" was preferred to "of". Hiding Talk 18:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete Clear consensus below and in previous cfd debates. Hiding Talk 18:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
per respect of English grammar. Pascal.Tesson 21:27, 12 October 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Opposed. No consensus for the proposed rename, in fact a clear consensus to keep the current name. Hiding Talk 18:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category: United States Courts of Appeals judges to Category: United States circuit judges
The result of the debate was Rename. No objections noted below. Hiding Talk 18:27, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:WikiProject Reference pages to Category:WikiProject Contents pages