The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Athlete actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was rename M a rtinp23 20:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename as Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_July_4#Category:Apple_litigation_to_Category:Apple_Computer_litigation_or_Category:Litigation_of_Apple_Computer abd Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_November_14#Apple_Computer_category. Duwiwne 22:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Andrew c 02:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Elections to the Parliament of Great Britain M a rtinp23 20:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British elections (1707-1800) into Category:Elections in Great Britain
The result of the debate was rename per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The useage of "free" is much more the convention then "GPL" (which is the most prevelant kind of free software); asides from being out-of-synch, this could potentially leave out some Free software. Oberiko 19:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Years by decade into Category:Decades
The result of the debate was rename per nom. David Kernow (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Operations of the South African Border War to Category:Battles and operations of the South African Border War
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename per nom M a rtinp23 20:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Venezuelan military to Category:Venezuelan military personnel
The result of the debate was nom withdrawn. David Kernow (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was nom withdrawn M a rtinp23 20:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was moved to Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Category:Wikipedians with PGP/GPG keys. Andrew c 02:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wikipedians with PGP/GPG keys into Category:Wikipedians who use PGP
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Fictional characters by religion. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Fictional misanthropes. David Kernow (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I find this a rather weird name. It contains a number of aggressive aliens whom we've had fictional war with, and probably some of the more genocidally-inclined supervillains. This doesn't appear to be a meaningful grouping, so I hereby join Category:Real wikipedians who are opposed to this category. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep M a rtinp23 20:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A character's eating habits are not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I think this may be too narrow. It contains only two characters, for one of which (Grandpa Simpson) the membership is not a defining characterstic but a one-off joke in a single episode. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Fictional United States Democrats and
Category:Fictional United States Republicans.
the wub
"?!"
10:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
These should probably be renamed to counter systemic bias. Outside the USA, "democrat" means "someone who is democratic", not "someone who supports the USA Democrat Party". (
Radiant)
13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep, although perhaps members ought only qualify if their fictional source/s state they are anarchic... David Kernow (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I'm afraid this may constitute original research, as for most fictional characters being "anarchist" is poorly defined. For instance, Captain Nemo is in here, but he is more an escapist who lives away from governments; and V (for Vendetta) is more a revolutionary in that he wants a government but not this one. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is not a defining characteristic. It would technically include almost all superheroes and fictional spies. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Fictional murderers per Radiant. David Kernow (talk) 02:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Overcategorization, merge back to "fictional murderers". And I've learned a new word today :) ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The weird thing is that this category states it should only be used for villains, and lists Luke Skywalker as an example of someone who is a mass murderer (since he killed a bunch of storm troopers) but can't be listed since he's a good guy. We should either rename this cat to reflect that, or reword the header to straighten it out, or simply merge into "cat:murderers". ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Considering most speech impediments (e.g. those by many cartoon characters) are just silly jokes (as opposed to real-life speech impediments that are not) I do not consider this a meaningful characterization. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep M a rtinp23 20:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Appears to be redundant with Category:Fictional lame characters, except that the latter may contain characters in a setting where wheelchairs have not been invited yet. Suggest merging. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was category relisted on December 8 CfD. David Kernow (talk) 02:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Multiple people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, or, because I realise deletion is a very bold proposal, at least rename to
Category:Biographies of multiple people. I do not think that being "multiple people" is a defining characteristic of any of the subjects of articles in the list, or of its sub-categories: at random, the
Wright brothers,
Dorothea, and
Margaret of York,
Gilbert and George,
Flanders and Swann,
Marx brothers are not notable because they are more than one person, but because they have made a notable contribution in their field of collaboration,
Category:Married couples are perhaps notable for being married, but not for being more than one person,
Category:Multiple births are notable for being more than one person only in gynaecology. This category answers only the question "what articles are about more than one person?" which I do not class as an encyclopedic question. Its parent category is
Category:People by status, but being more than one of you is not really a "status", and after some thought I have not been able to suggest another useful parent cat. The category's current title is too broad:
jury,
cabinet,
quorum,
string quartet,
Queen (band), and
collective bargaining all arguably fit its current name. I feel it should be submitted for discussion, anyway, to test whether I am a lone voice, and in case a consensus is forthcoming.
RobertG ♬
talk
12:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 02:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Not a defining characteristic. Way too many characters in series have won a lottery at some point. ( Radiant) 10:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Judaic views (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete all.
the wub
"?!"
13:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Alpha Flight Members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Alpha Flight members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Thunderbolts Members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Speedy delete as re-created categories. See
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_October_17#Marvel_Comics_superhero_team_memberships.
CovenantD
07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep. David Kernow (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:People from Thiruvananthapuram. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Prominent Trivandrumites to Category:People from Trivandrum
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional anti-heroes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Speedy delete as recreated category. See
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_13#Category:Anti-heroes.
CovenantD
00:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Athlete actors (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was rename M a rtinp23 20:25, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Rename as Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_July_4#Category:Apple_litigation_to_Category:Apple_Computer_litigation_or_Category:Litigation_of_Apple_Computer abd Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_November_14#Apple_Computer_category. Duwiwne 22:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. Andrew c 02:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Elections to the Parliament of Great Britain M a rtinp23 20:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:British elections (1707-1800) into Category:Elections in Great Britain
The result of the debate was rename per nom. David Kernow (talk) 21:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The useage of "free" is much more the convention then "GPL" (which is the most prevelant kind of free software); asides from being out-of-synch, this could potentially leave out some Free software. Oberiko 19:29, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge per nom. David Kernow (talk) 22:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Years by decade into Category:Decades
The result of the debate was rename per nom. David Kernow (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Operations of the South African Border War to Category:Battles and operations of the South African Border War
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename per nom M a rtinp23 20:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Venezuelan military to Category:Venezuelan military personnel
The result of the debate was nom withdrawn. David Kernow (talk) 07:02, 25 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was nom withdrawn M a rtinp23 20:46, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was moved to Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Category:Wikipedians with PGP/GPG keys. Andrew c 02:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Wikipedians with PGP/GPG keys into Category:Wikipedians who use PGP
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant with Category:Fictional characters by religion. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete M a rtinp23 20:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic, not objectively defined. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Fictional misanthropes. David Kernow (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I find this a rather weird name. It contains a number of aggressive aliens whom we've had fictional war with, and probably some of the more genocidally-inclined supervillains. This doesn't appear to be a meaningful grouping, so I hereby join Category:Real wikipedians who are opposed to this category. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep M a rtinp23 20:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
A character's eating habits are not a defining characteristic. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I think this may be too narrow. It contains only two characters, for one of which (Grandpa Simpson) the membership is not a defining characterstic but a one-off joke in a single episode. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to
Category:Fictional United States Democrats and
Category:Fictional United States Republicans.
the wub
"?!"
10:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
These should probably be renamed to counter systemic bias. Outside the USA, "democrat" means "someone who is democratic", not "someone who supports the USA Democrat Party". (
Radiant)
13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep, although perhaps members ought only qualify if their fictional source/s state they are anarchic... David Kernow (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
I'm afraid this may constitute original research, as for most fictional characters being "anarchist" is poorly defined. For instance, Captain Nemo is in here, but he is more an escapist who lives away from governments; and V (for Vendetta) is more a revolutionary in that he wants a government but not this one. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
This is not a defining characteristic. It would technically include almost all superheroes and fictional spies. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge with Fictional murderers per Radiant. David Kernow (talk) 02:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Overcategorization, merge back to "fictional murderers". And I've learned a new word today :) ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The weird thing is that this category states it should only be used for villains, and lists Luke Skywalker as an example of someone who is a mass murderer (since he killed a bunch of storm troopers) but can't be listed since he's a good guy. We should either rename this cat to reflect that, or reword the header to straighten it out, or simply merge into "cat:murderers". ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 14:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Considering most speech impediments (e.g. those by many cartoon characters) are just silly jokes (as opposed to real-life speech impediments that are not) I do not consider this a meaningful characterization. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep M a rtinp23 20:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC) Appears to be redundant with Category:Fictional lame characters, except that the latter may contain characters in a setting where wheelchairs have not been invited yet. Suggest merging. ( Radiant) 13:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was category relisted on December 8 CfD. David Kernow (talk) 02:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Multiple people (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Delete, or, because I realise deletion is a very bold proposal, at least rename to
Category:Biographies of multiple people. I do not think that being "multiple people" is a defining characteristic of any of the subjects of articles in the list, or of its sub-categories: at random, the
Wright brothers,
Dorothea, and
Margaret of York,
Gilbert and George,
Flanders and Swann,
Marx brothers are not notable because they are more than one person, but because they have made a notable contribution in their field of collaboration,
Category:Married couples are perhaps notable for being married, but not for being more than one person,
Category:Multiple births are notable for being more than one person only in gynaecology. This category answers only the question "what articles are about more than one person?" which I do not class as an encyclopedic question. Its parent category is
Category:People by status, but being more than one of you is not really a "status", and after some thought I have not been able to suggest another useful parent cat. The category's current title is too broad:
jury,
cabinet,
quorum,
string quartet,
Queen (band), and
collective bargaining all arguably fit its current name. I feel it should be submitted for discussion, anyway, to test whether I am a lone voice, and in case a consensus is forthcoming.
RobertG ♬
talk
12:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Andrew c 02:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC) Not a defining characteristic. Way too many characters in series have won a lottery at some point. ( Radiant) 10:26, 24 November 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 02:23, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Judaic views (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
The result of the debate was delete all.
the wub
"?!"
13:02, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Category:Alpha Flight Members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Alpha Flight members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Category:Thunderbolts Members (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Speedy delete as re-created categories. See
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_October_17#Marvel_Comics_superhero_team_memberships.
CovenantD
07:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was keep. David Kernow (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:People from Thiruvananthapuram. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Prominent Trivandrumites to Category:People from Trivandrum
The result of the debate was delete. -- RobertG ♬ talk 11:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional anti-heroes (
|
talk |
history |
links |
watch |
logs)
Speedy delete as recreated category. See
Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_May_13#Category:Anti-heroes.
CovenantD
00:13, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
reply