The result of the debate was merge. -- TexasAndroid 18:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant to Category:c. Nippon Pro Baseball also redirects to Japanese baseball. DMG413 20:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensous. -- TexasAndroid 18:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Has only one entry, Category:Nova Scotia sports teams, which should be merged with Category:Nova Scotia sports to follow all other Canadian province sports categories. Similar to the Municipal sports teams debate, which resulted in speedy deletion.-- Mike Selinker 20:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:19, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Seemingly original research, created by creator of only article in this category. Molerat 20:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated. Syrthiss 18:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Few, if any, of the people in these categories are notable for lecturing - I think most are known for other academic work, i.e. research, writing, etc, and I suspect some of them have never done any lecturing. Including subcategories:
Vclaw 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. -- TexasAndroid 18:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
We recently deleted [1] it at wikinews as being "inherently POV" due to state terrorism generally not being included in normal usage, various acts by non-violent groups often being described as terrorism by significant segments of the American population, etc. However, this deletion has remained contentious and I see no reason why wikipedia and wikinews should differ with respect to inclusion of this category. So I'd like to poll the wikipedia community on this matter. I argued for, but did not vote for, the deletion on wikinews. And I am unconvinced either way at present. I will not vote here. JeffBurdges 18:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. -- TexasAndroid 18:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Unless someone can produce non-biased scientific evidence that being a lesbian helps a woman to win a sport, every addition to this category serves only to promote lesbianism and is therefore a breach of the neutrality rules. Therefore the category should be empty, so it follows that it should be deleted. Votes from LGBT activists will probably pour in, but they should only be counted in proportion to the number of LGBT's in society, or the result will be biased. Golfcam 17:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename all. -- TexasAndroid 18:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Napoleonic wars ought to have "wars" capitalized as I believe "Napoleonic War(s)" is a two-word proper noun (see main article Napoleonic Wars). Thereafter a number of its subcategories have less-than-grammatical names. Propose the following:
The result of the debate was no consensous. -- TexasAndroid 18:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Revolution people and some of its similarly-named subcategories (see below) have less-than-grammatical names. Propose the following:
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The Placeopedia template is well and good, but I fail to see the value of collecting all its uses in a category. It reads like a random collection of locations. - EurekaLott 08:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- MarkSweep (call me collect) 12:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This was a temporary solution to help handle the proliferation of userbox categories. That problem is now under control and everything that used to be in this cat is now in Category:Wikipedians or its sub cats. -- 68.122.225.30 05:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category is much too broad - if properly comprehensive, it would contain at least tens of thousands of entries. Also the categorization of "parent" is not special or specific enough - what is the use of this category? It seems rather gratuitous (by comparison, the recent "Living people" category is of course broader, but it has a specific deliberate function for Wikipedia policy purposes i.e. identifying articles which need extra scrutiny to protect against legal and reputational risk.). as an aside, the current entries in the fictional parents category list also seem like a very narrow selection - mainly cartoon and comic characters. Bwithh 04:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep separate. -- TexasAndroid 18:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge - Slo-mo 04:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge. -- TexasAndroid 18:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant --> merge - Slo-mo 04:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty category with no subcategories, pages, etc. and the only contributor was Huaiwei. Эйрон Кинни ( t) 04:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete Empty; appears abandoned; correct form would include "Members of the European Parliament from Italy". Duplicates Category:Images of MEPs from Italy, 6th term. JonHarder 03:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete all three. -- TexasAndroid 19:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Plus Category:Coastal towns in Balochistan and Category:Coastal towns in Sindh.
The result of the debate was speedy rename to Category:Rat-baiting dog breeds. -- MarkSweep (call me collect) 12:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC) Rename to Category:Rat baiting dog breeds fixes capitalization issue with "B"aiting and removes "s" from dogs. SirIsaacBrock 01:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Moved from AFD:
Doesn't need a full category for one person. (originally listed by User:JoshuaZ) — sjorford (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge. -- TexasAndroid 18:17, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant to Category:c. Nippon Pro Baseball also redirects to Japanese baseball. DMG413 20:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensous. -- TexasAndroid 18:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Has only one entry, Category:Nova Scotia sports teams, which should be merged with Category:Nova Scotia sports to follow all other Canadian province sports categories. Similar to the Municipal sports teams debate, which resulted in speedy deletion.-- Mike Selinker 20:20, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:19, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Seemingly original research, created by creator of only article in this category. Molerat 20:22, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated. Syrthiss 18:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Few, if any, of the people in these categories are notable for lecturing - I think most are known for other academic work, i.e. research, writing, etc, and I suspect some of them have never done any lecturing. Including subcategories:
Vclaw 18:15, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. -- TexasAndroid 18:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
We recently deleted [1] it at wikinews as being "inherently POV" due to state terrorism generally not being included in normal usage, various acts by non-violent groups often being described as terrorism by significant segments of the American population, etc. However, this deletion has remained contentious and I see no reason why wikipedia and wikinews should differ with respect to inclusion of this category. So I'd like to poll the wikipedia community on this matter. I argued for, but did not vote for, the deletion on wikinews. And I am unconvinced either way at present. I will not vote here. JeffBurdges 18:10, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep. -- TexasAndroid 18:26, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Unless someone can produce non-biased scientific evidence that being a lesbian helps a woman to win a sport, every addition to this category serves only to promote lesbianism and is therefore a breach of the neutrality rules. Therefore the category should be empty, so it follows that it should be deleted. Votes from LGBT activists will probably pour in, but they should only be counted in proportion to the number of LGBT's in society, or the result will be biased. Golfcam 17:27, 5 March 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was rename all. -- TexasAndroid 18:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Napoleonic wars ought to have "wars" capitalized as I believe "Napoleonic War(s)" is a two-word proper noun (see main article Napoleonic Wars). Thereafter a number of its subcategories have less-than-grammatical names. Propose the following:
The result of the debate was no consensous. -- TexasAndroid 18:35, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Revolution people and some of its similarly-named subcategories (see below) have less-than-grammatical names. Propose the following:
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:40, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The Placeopedia template is well and good, but I fail to see the value of collecting all its uses in a category. It reads like a random collection of locations. - EurekaLott 08:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy delete. -- MarkSweep (call me collect) 12:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This was a temporary solution to help handle the proliferation of userbox categories. That problem is now under control and everything that used to be in this cat is now in Category:Wikipedians or its sub cats. -- 68.122.225.30 05:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
This category is much too broad - if properly comprehensive, it would contain at least tens of thousands of entries. Also the categorization of "parent" is not special or specific enough - what is the use of this category? It seems rather gratuitous (by comparison, the recent "Living people" category is of course broader, but it has a specific deliberate function for Wikipedia policy purposes i.e. identifying articles which need extra scrutiny to protect against legal and reputational risk.). as an aside, the current entries in the fictional parents category list also seem like a very narrow selection - mainly cartoon and comic characters. Bwithh 04:59, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Keep separate. -- TexasAndroid 18:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Merge - Slo-mo 04:32, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge. -- TexasAndroid 18:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Redundant --> merge - Slo-mo 04:26, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty category with no subcategories, pages, etc. and the only contributor was Huaiwei. Эйрон Кинни ( t) 04:00, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC) Delete Empty; appears abandoned; correct form would include "Members of the European Parliament from Italy". Duplicates Category:Images of MEPs from Italy, 6th term. JonHarder 03:37, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete all three. -- TexasAndroid 19:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Plus Category:Coastal towns in Balochistan and Category:Coastal towns in Sindh.
The result of the debate was speedy rename to Category:Rat-baiting dog breeds. -- MarkSweep (call me collect) 12:58, 5 March 2006 (UTC) Rename to Category:Rat baiting dog breeds fixes capitalization issue with "B"aiting and removes "s" from dogs. SirIsaacBrock 01:53, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. -- TexasAndroid 18:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC) reply
Moved from AFD:
Doesn't need a full category for one person. (originally listed by User:JoshuaZ) — sjorford (talk) 00:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC) reply