The result of the debate was listified as List of sportspeople who served or are serving in political office. David Kernow (talk) 06:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete This category is a month old, and wasn't a category along the lines of Category:Athlete-politicians deleted some time recently? Certainly several cross-categories of this sort have been deleted. They create clutter because people with multiple careers will be in many categories already, and the connection between the members of this category is no more than quirky trivia. Osomec 22:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete as empty; if necessary, recreate as X86 Macintosh computers or the like. David Kernow (talk) 06:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete - This category is entirely superfuluous and confusing.
Niohe 20:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete - No point to it--
Fabio 23:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Article was created then redirected to an article. The category is empty and I'm not sure if it's useful. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The category name is misleading as explained on its main page. These individuals were not simply against the war, but actually promoted the war and later changed their minds. Maybe a more accurate name for the category could be employed, like "Neoconservatives with second thoughts about the Iraq war", but it seems to cumbersome. I propose deletion in the absence of renaming since the title is misleading. 70.48.70.119 14:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Timrollpickering 14:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. David Kernow (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic; category clutter. The result is good material for the Walhalla Temple article. Oh look, these people are all listed on the Walhalla Temple article! RobertG ♬ talk 13:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was listified as List of sportspeople who served or are serving in political office. David Kernow (talk) 06:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete This category is a month old, and wasn't a category along the lines of Category:Athlete-politicians deleted some time recently? Certainly several cross-categories of this sort have been deleted. They create clutter because people with multiple careers will be in many categories already, and the connection between the members of this category is no more than quirky trivia. Osomec 22:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete as empty; if necessary, recreate as X86 Macintosh computers or the like. David Kernow (talk) 06:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Delete - This category is entirely superfuluous and confusing.
Niohe 20:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
Delete - No point to it--
Fabio 23:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Article was created then redirected to an article. The category is empty and I'm not sure if it's useful. *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The category name is misleading as explained on its main page. These individuals were not simply against the war, but actually promoted the war and later changed their minds. Maybe a more accurate name for the category could be employed, like "Neoconservatives with second thoughts about the Iraq war", but it seems to cumbersome. I propose deletion in the absence of renaming since the title is misleading. 70.48.70.119 14:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. Timrollpickering 14:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep. David Kernow (talk) 06:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
Not a defining characteristic; category clutter. The result is good material for the Walhalla Temple article. Oh look, these people are all listed on the Walhalla Temple article! RobertG ♬ talk 13:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. David Kernow (talk) 05:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus. David Kernow (talk) 05:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. David Kernow (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC) reply