The result of the debate was deleted. the wub "?!" 11:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Zhongshanese people to
Category:People from Zhongshan
and
and
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete; found empty -- Kbdank71 14:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional villainess' to Category:Fictional villainesses
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 11:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Nonfiction television series to Category:Non-fiction television series
The result of the debate was delete (merge has been completed). the wub "?!" 11:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Congenital genetic disorders into Category:Genetic disorders
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category is too specific and does not follow musician category naming conventions. -- musicpvm 21:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
POV category clutter. -- musicpvm 21:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 14:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Audio book narrators ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Both cats seem to be for Tamil literature; they point to the same main article and contain many of the same articles. Category:Tamil literature is consistent with other literature categories, so Category:Classical Tamil should be merged into it and deleted. -- musicpvm 21:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 10:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I previously nominated this for a merge (see discussion here). The result of that debate was "no consensus", but most users agreed it should be renamed to Category:British radio DJs, as that name would be consistent with its parent cats. -- musicpvm 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Numbered routes in Massachusetts to Category:Massachusetts State Highways
this is messedrocker
(talk)
10:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus on merge; renaming it to Category:Pro-Soviet propaganda films to fix capitalization -- Kbdank71 14:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Standardizing these subcategories of category:Wikipedians interested in radio, in the manner of category:Wikipedians who listen to KROQ:
I didn’t spell out NPR or LBC because I think they’re much better known by their abbreviations.-- Mike Selinker 19:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Judeo-Islamic topics. the wub "?!" 11:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Jewish Islam topics to Category:Judeo-Islamic Topics
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Universities and colleges affiliated with the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Asad TV ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Per this CfD and others, I’m suggesting adding Wikipedian to some names, and standardizing formatting.
Two templates here: Wikipedians who read X and Wikipedians who like X (the latter matching TV). Wikipedians who read X could become Wikipedians who like X if we prefer. (The WWE one is based on the theory that WWE is more of a TV show than a sport.)-- Mike Selinker 17:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Students who committed suicide ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy deleted. the wub "?!" 11:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Business/postads ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was cats not tagged for two weeks, closing discussion -- Kbdank71 15:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
These form the root of a tangled tree, which I discovered when Category:British bass guitarists showed up on the uncategorized categories list. I think expert help is really needed here. -- ProveIt (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I think there are more articles categorised in the English bassists, American bassists, and American rock bassists that anything in the bass guitarist categories. The term bassist is used far more often, than "bass guitarist" in the rock press. I know someone created British Bass guitarists, Scottish bass guitarists without actually bothering to check what other people were categorised as. I would think deleting the british bass guitarists, scottish bass guitarists, and and welsh bass guitarists would be the best option as the scottish bassists, english bassist, welsh bassist categories are the ones being used more.
I haven't looked at the articles but something that springs to mind is the double bass as played by Willie Dixon and other blues musicians. Is this only about bass guitar because if not it makes a difference? -- BlackJack | talk page 19:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was reverse merge -- Kbdank71 15:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Both these categories exist, Caliphates however had only 2 entries and was listed under Caliphate. I moved the two entries to Caliphate leaving this one empty. Its an obvious duplication.-- Tigeroo 09:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge into Category:Artists by record label -- Kbdank71 15:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The performers category should be merged into the musicians category as they both mean the same thing. All other categories use the term "musician". -- musicpvm 07:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:New Super Mario Bros. media ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Indo China Kingdoms ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already renamed to Category:Arabian slaveholders -- Kbdank71 14:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional perverts ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
per·vert Pronunciation Key (pr-vûrt)
tr.v. per·vert·ed, per·vert·ing, per·verts
1. To cause to turn away from what is right, proper, or good; corrupt.
2. To bring to a bad or worse condition; debase.
3. To put to a wrong or improper use; misuse. See Synonyms at corrupt.
4. To interpret incorrectly; misconstrue or distort: an analysis that perverts the meaning of the poem.
The verb of the word however brings out the defination that this category is trying to represent. One who practices sexual perversion.
My point is that I don't agree with Tjstrf's idea of simply deleting it, I mean the description can be corrected without reccomending it for deletion. However the only issue I have is the multiple definitions of the word so I would suggest to deleted this category and move the material to differently named category where there won't be a definition issue. - Adv193 06:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Marvel Man Villains ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 08:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Actors that portrayed heroes or villains ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was deleted. the wub "?!" 11:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Zhongshanese people to
Category:People from Zhongshan
and
and
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete; found empty -- Kbdank71 14:44, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional villainess' to Category:Fictional villainesses
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 11:18, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Nonfiction television series to Category:Non-fiction television series
The result of the debate was delete (merge has been completed). the wub "?!" 11:49, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Congenital genetic disorders into Category:Genetic disorders
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category is too specific and does not follow musician category naming conventions. -- musicpvm 21:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:41, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
POV category clutter. -- musicpvm 21:43, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 14:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Audio book narrators ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:38, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Both cats seem to be for Tamil literature; they point to the same main article and contain many of the same articles. Category:Tamil literature is consistent with other literature categories, so Category:Classical Tamil should be merged into it and deleted. -- musicpvm 21:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename. the wub "?!" 10:17, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
I previously nominated this for a merge (see discussion here). The result of that debate was "no consensus", but most users agreed it should be renamed to Category:British radio DJs, as that name would be consistent with its parent cats. -- musicpvm 21:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:35, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Numbered routes in Massachusetts to Category:Massachusetts State Highways
this is messedrocker
(talk)
10:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus on merge; renaming it to Category:Pro-Soviet propaganda films to fix capitalization -- Kbdank71 14:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Standardizing these subcategories of category:Wikipedians interested in radio, in the manner of category:Wikipedians who listen to KROQ:
I didn’t spell out NPR or LBC because I think they’re much better known by their abbreviations.-- Mike Selinker 19:31, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename to Category:Judeo-Islamic topics. the wub "?!" 11:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Jewish Islam topics to Category:Judeo-Islamic Topics
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Universities and colleges affiliated with the General Association of Regular Baptist Churches ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:20, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Asad TV ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Per this CfD and others, I’m suggesting adding Wikipedian to some names, and standardizing formatting.
Two templates here: Wikipedians who read X and Wikipedians who like X (the latter matching TV). Wikipedians who read X could become Wikipedians who like X if we prefer. (The WWE one is based on the theory that WWE is more of a TV show than a sport.)-- Mike Selinker 17:47, 7 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Students who committed suicide ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:27, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was speedy deleted. the wub "?!" 11:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Business/postads ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:24, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was cats not tagged for two weeks, closing discussion -- Kbdank71 15:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
These form the root of a tangled tree, which I discovered when Category:British bass guitarists showed up on the uncategorized categories list. I think expert help is really needed here. -- ProveIt (talk) 18:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I think there are more articles categorised in the English bassists, American bassists, and American rock bassists that anything in the bass guitarist categories. The term bassist is used far more often, than "bass guitarist" in the rock press. I know someone created British Bass guitarists, Scottish bass guitarists without actually bothering to check what other people were categorised as. I would think deleting the british bass guitarists, scottish bass guitarists, and and welsh bass guitarists would be the best option as the scottish bassists, english bassist, welsh bassist categories are the ones being used more.
I haven't looked at the articles but something that springs to mind is the double bass as played by Willie Dixon and other blues musicians. Is this only about bass guitar because if not it makes a difference? -- BlackJack | talk page 19:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:17, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was reverse merge -- Kbdank71 15:16, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Both these categories exist, Caliphates however had only 2 entries and was listed under Caliphate. I moved the two entries to Caliphate leaving this one empty. Its an obvious duplication.-- Tigeroo 09:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge into Category:Artists by record label -- Kbdank71 15:13, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The performers category should be merged into the musicians category as they both mean the same thing. All other categories use the term "musician". -- musicpvm 07:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:10, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:New Super Mario Bros. media ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:09, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Indo China Kingdoms ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:07, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:50, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:48, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already renamed to Category:Arabian slaveholders -- Kbdank71 14:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename/merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Fictional perverts ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
per·vert Pronunciation Key (pr-vûrt)
tr.v. per·vert·ed, per·vert·ing, per·verts
1. To cause to turn away from what is right, proper, or good; corrupt.
2. To bring to a bad or worse condition; debase.
3. To put to a wrong or improper use; misuse. See Synonyms at corrupt.
4. To interpret incorrectly; misconstrue or distort: an analysis that perverts the meaning of the poem.
The verb of the word however brings out the defination that this category is trying to represent. One who practices sexual perversion.
My point is that I don't agree with Tjstrf's idea of simply deleting it, I mean the description can be corrected without reccomending it for deletion. However the only issue I have is the multiple definitions of the word so I would suggest to deleted this category and move the material to differently named category where there won't be a definition issue. - Adv193 06:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 09:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Marvel Man Villains ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
The result of the debate was delete. the wub "?!" 08:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Category:Actors that portrayed heroes or villains ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)