The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The entries in this category have been manually moved to Category:Stampede Wrestling alumni, rendering the original category redundant. McPhail 02:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 14:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The following are badly named and need renaming:
im not totally happy with the new names so any suggestions are welcome, but they definately need changing from whats there now. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 02:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally unneccessary delinieation by subgenre. Until I just added a catmore template there wasn't even any description of what on earth "Bongo Flava" is. Bongo Flava is itself a mere redirect to Tanzanian hip hop, which says that "fusion is sometimes called Bongo Flava" (my emphasis). The hip hop by nation categories are already way too deep and underpopulated so this to me is a very clear merge candidate. kingboyk 18:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensous. - TexasAndroid 16:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
All four newly created today - articles were previously in Category:British MPs. MPs are elected to the Parliament of the United Kingdom on equal terms. I see no clear reason to subdivide them by the nation in which their constituency lies. Also the new names are horrendously long! Action appears to be unilateral on the part of the editor who made the change despite there being no consensus as per the ongoing discussion on whether to divide and/or rename this cat. (See Category talk:British MPs). Valiantis 18:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty and inappropriate. Circeus 15:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Category only contains three articles, all of which are lists of weapons. It's doubtful that the individual weapons should be broken out into separate articles any time soon, so the three lists could just be put in Category:Halo 2 and Category:Computer and video game weapons. — TKD:: Talk 14:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable, many in category are not buildings. Better suited to a single list article JBellis 13:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was discussion already completed. - EurekaLott 13:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing existing CfR process from 30 March (has there been a vote elsewhere I can't find?). I support this change for consitency with Category:Members of the pre-1707 English Parliament and to avoid confusion with current UK MPs for Scottish constituencies. Mtiedemann 11:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 15:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The term 'Australian Rules' is incorrect capitalisation. Remy B 10:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
An empty category, and one whose criteria is difficult to judge. Better to use the subcategories of category:Cancer deaths.-- Mike Selinker 08:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant to Category:Villages in Cumbria
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant to Category:São Paulo Futebol Clube players
The result of the debate was Keep. - TexasAndroid 15:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Renaming this category adds relevance and makes the topic more interesting. All articles about fires at Wikipedia should have historical significance. GilliamJF 05:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 15:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(a) shorter (shock horror); (b) not all members of this category are persons. Cf also Category:Counter-revolutionaries. David Kernow 05:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant, spelling counts -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by User:Ccwaters -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by User:Cursive -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The first of these categories was previously listed in Category:Elections by country which was POV because the EU is not a country. It should be renamed Category:European Parliament elections, which describes its purpose accurately. However Category:European Parliament results also exists and I can't see that it is needed as well as the Category:European Parliament elections so it should be merged into Category:European Parliament elections as well. Some of the content will need to be moved, but that is the case anyway. CalJW 04:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The parent category of the category listed below and three categories that were listed yesterday. Grouping one or two sports by the names of bodies that most people have probably never heard of just isn't helpful. The Olympics articles are already grouped by sport, which the appropriate thing to do. Golfcam 03:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This nomination makes a set with the other three listed below. Grouping one or two sports by the names of bodies that most people have probably never heard of just isn't helpful. The Olympics articles are already grouped by sport, which the appropriate thing to do. Golfcam 03:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
There is only one page in this category, and the category won't get bigger. ЄИЄЯפЇЄ 02:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Made redundant by
Category:Buildings and structures in Bridgetown, the correctly named category --
Francs
2000
01:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The entries in this category have been manually moved to Category:Stampede Wrestling alumni, rendering the original category redundant. McPhail 02:20, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 14:57, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The following are badly named and need renaming:
im not totally happy with the new names so any suggestions are welcome, but they definately need changing from whats there now. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 02:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Totally unneccessary delinieation by subgenre. Until I just added a catmore template there wasn't even any description of what on earth "Bongo Flava" is. Bongo Flava is itself a mere redirect to Tanzanian hip hop, which says that "fusion is sometimes called Bongo Flava" (my emphasis). The hip hop by nation categories are already way too deep and underpopulated so this to me is a very clear merge candidate. kingboyk 18:30, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was No consensous. - TexasAndroid 16:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
All four newly created today - articles were previously in Category:British MPs. MPs are elected to the Parliament of the United Kingdom on equal terms. I see no clear reason to subdivide them by the nation in which their constituency lies. Also the new names are horrendously long! Action appears to be unilateral on the part of the editor who made the change despite there being no consensus as per the ongoing discussion on whether to divide and/or rename this cat. (See Category talk:British MPs). Valiantis 18:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Empty and inappropriate. Circeus 15:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Category only contains three articles, all of which are lists of weapons. It's doubtful that the individual weapons should be broken out into separate articles any time soon, so the three lists could just be put in Category:Halo 2 and Category:Computer and video game weapons. — TKD:: Talk 14:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Not notable, many in category are not buildings. Better suited to a single list article JBellis 13:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was discussion already completed. - EurekaLott 13:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Completing existing CfR process from 30 March (has there been a vote elsewhere I can't find?). I support this change for consitency with Category:Members of the pre-1707 English Parliament and to avoid confusion with current UK MPs for Scottish constituencies. Mtiedemann 11:12, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 15:05, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The term 'Australian Rules' is incorrect capitalisation. Remy B 10:06, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
An empty category, and one whose criteria is difficult to judge. Better to use the subcategories of category:Cancer deaths.-- Mike Selinker 08:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant to Category:Villages in Cumbria
The result of the debate was Merge. - TexasAndroid 15:07, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant to Category:São Paulo Futebol Clube players
The result of the debate was Keep. - TexasAndroid 15:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Renaming this category adds relevance and makes the topic more interesting. All articles about fires at Wikipedia should have historical significance. GilliamJF 05:59, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename. - TexasAndroid 15:10, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
(a) shorter (shock horror); (b) not all members of this category are persons. Cf also Category:Counter-revolutionaries. David Kernow 05:36, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
redundant, spelling counts -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was already deleted. - TexasAndroid 14:58, 10 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by User:Ccwaters -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:12, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by its creator -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:14, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
blanked by User:Cursive -- ProveIt (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The first of these categories was previously listed in Category:Elections by country which was POV because the EU is not a country. It should be renamed Category:European Parliament elections, which describes its purpose accurately. However Category:European Parliament results also exists and I can't see that it is needed as well as the Category:European Parliament elections so it should be merged into Category:European Parliament elections as well. Some of the content will need to be moved, but that is the case anyway. CalJW 04:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The parent category of the category listed below and three categories that were listed yesterday. Grouping one or two sports by the names of bodies that most people have probably never heard of just isn't helpful. The Olympics articles are already grouped by sport, which the appropriate thing to do. Golfcam 03:07, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 19:29, 17 April 2006 (UTC) reply
This nomination makes a set with the other three listed below. Grouping one or two sports by the names of bodies that most people have probably never heard of just isn't helpful. The Olympics articles are already grouped by sport, which the appropriate thing to do. Golfcam 03:05, 9 April 2006 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
There is only one page in this category, and the category won't get bigger. ЄИЄЯפЇЄ 02:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC). reply
The result of the debate was Delete. - TexasAndroid 15:18, 18 April 2006 (UTC) reply
Made redundant by
Category:Buildings and structures in Bridgetown, the correctly named category --
Francs
2000
01:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
reply