The result of the debate was listify -- Kbdank71 18:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a list, not a category. The content should be moved to List of English words for sounds or the category be renamed to Category:English words for sounds and the individual words added to it. Kusma (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 18:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The Taoiseach is the constitutional title of the prime minister created under the 1937 Constitution of Ireland, which is still the basic law of the state it created Ireland (or Éire) officially. This constitution predates the Republic of Ireland by twelve years and thus the usage of the term Republic of Ireland is not strictly valid because 1) the Taoiseach predated the Republic of Ireland by twelve years, 2) The official name of the state is Ireland and thus the constitutionally created office of Taoiseach should reflect the official name of the state and not its description Republic of Ireland. Djegan 20:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The proposed name is more consistant with the mother article Department of State (Ireland) and also the law of the Republic of Ireland that makes it clear that they are indeed Departments of State [1] and not Departments of the Irish Government. The latter name is simply bad naming. Djegan 19:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty after all articles deleted by AfD>. - Splash talk 17:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
consistency with Category:Manx people, Category:British people, Category:Welsh people etc. Man vyi 16:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:52, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
West Glamorgan no longer exists and did not exist at the time most of these people were born. Deb 11:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Iceland has a combined category for settlements of all sizes. The convention for specific types of settlement such as towns and cities is to use the "in" form. Rename
Category:Settlements in Iceland. Tentatively amended to
Category:Cities, towns and villages in Iceland.
CalJW 18:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The only reason I am nominating this is because User:IZAK is using it as an excuse to delete categories like Category:Jewish Americans. This is not a category for names, it's a category for lists. If IZAK feels this isn't necessary, then fine, but better this go than say, an actual category like Category:Jewish Americans. Vulturell 09:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Foreign to whom? I might not have objected if this were called "foreign language game shows" and then listed non-English game shows (since this is English Wikipedia), but this was a British show. Delete. -- Nlu 02:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This had come up back on October 21, but got missed in the shuffle. Basically, Canadian English in this situation goes along with the rest of the non-American world in the usage of the word "Sport" to describe sporting activities as an abstraction. There's something of a midway comprimise between British and American usage, however, in that the section of the newspaper is still generally named Sports and the word "sports" probably crops up in a lot of conversational scenarios where Britons might say "sport". But when dealing with the field as a whole (ie, in contexts akin to "The Arts" or "Commerce" or "Industry"), we are unrepentantly colonial—note the nomenclature of Canadian Interuniversity Sport or the federal government's Minister of State for Sport. The Tom 01:41, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename. Every individual in the category has used the title Prime Minister of Iraq, so to that end it provides increased clarity, and will let us file it with other groupings of prime ministers. Besides, to term all of them (especially some of the Ba'ath and early monarchy-era ones) as the heads of government is probably stretching things a bit--at best, some of them managed Prime Minister of France-level authority. The Tom 01:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the title of this one be either entirely "English" ("Film noirs") or entirely "French ("Films noirs") and not some half-hearted compromise? Personally I'd favour Category:Films noirs or - better yet - make the category singular ( Category:Film noir), to refer to the genre rather than the individual flicks. If Films noir is acceptable usage, though, I'll willingly withdraw this nomination. Grutness... wha? 00:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
_>|< 16:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Proposing renaming, as the category is made up of films that were not directed by Kubrick, but produced or associated with. -- Fallout boy 05:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was listify -- Kbdank71 18:00, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This is a list, not a category. The content should be moved to List of English words for sounds or the category be renamed to Category:English words for sounds and the individual words added to it. Kusma (talk) 20:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 18:02, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The Taoiseach is the constitutional title of the prime minister created under the 1937 Constitution of Ireland, which is still the basic law of the state it created Ireland (or Éire) officially. This constitution predates the Republic of Ireland by twelve years and thus the usage of the term Republic of Ireland is not strictly valid because 1) the Taoiseach predated the Republic of Ireland by twelve years, 2) The official name of the state is Ireland and thus the constitutionally created office of Taoiseach should reflect the official name of the state and not its description Republic of Ireland. Djegan 20:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:58, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The proposed name is more consistant with the mother article Department of State (Ireland) and also the law of the Republic of Ireland that makes it clear that they are indeed Departments of State [1] and not Departments of the Irish Government. The latter name is simply bad naming. Djegan 19:58, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty after all articles deleted by AfD>. - Splash talk 17:49, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
consistency with Category:Manx people, Category:British people, Category:Welsh people etc. Man vyi 16:10, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:52, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
West Glamorgan no longer exists and did not exist at the time most of these people were born. Deb 11:56, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Iceland has a combined category for settlements of all sizes. The convention for specific types of settlement such as towns and cities is to use the "in" form. Rename
Category:Settlements in Iceland. Tentatively amended to
Category:Cities, towns and villages in Iceland.
CalJW 18:25, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 17:40, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The only reason I am nominating this is because User:IZAK is using it as an excuse to delete categories like Category:Jewish Americans. This is not a category for names, it's a category for lists. If IZAK feels this isn't necessary, then fine, but better this go than say, an actual category like Category:Jewish Americans. Vulturell 09:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 17:26, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Foreign to whom? I might not have objected if this were called "foreign language game shows" and then listed non-English game shows (since this is English Wikipedia), but this was a British show. Delete. -- Nlu 02:24, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:24, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This had come up back on October 21, but got missed in the shuffle. Basically, Canadian English in this situation goes along with the rest of the non-American world in the usage of the word "Sport" to describe sporting activities as an abstraction. There's something of a midway comprimise between British and American usage, however, in that the section of the newspaper is still generally named Sports and the word "sports" probably crops up in a lot of conversational scenarios where Britons might say "sport". But when dealing with the field as a whole (ie, in contexts akin to "The Arts" or "Commerce" or "Industry"), we are unrepentantly colonial—note the nomenclature of Canadian Interuniversity Sport or the federal government's Minister of State for Sport. The Tom 01:41, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:21, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename. Every individual in the category has used the title Prime Minister of Iraq, so to that end it provides increased clarity, and will let us file it with other groupings of prime ministers. Besides, to term all of them (especially some of the Ba'ath and early monarchy-era ones) as the heads of government is probably stretching things a bit--at best, some of them managed Prime Minister of France-level authority. The Tom 01:15, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 17:11, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the title of this one be either entirely "English" ("Film noirs") or entirely "French ("Films noirs") and not some half-hearted compromise? Personally I'd favour Category:Films noirs or - better yet - make the category singular ( Category:Film noir), to refer to the genre rather than the individual flicks. If Films noir is acceptable usage, though, I'll willingly withdraw this nomination. Grutness... wha? 00:52, 27 November 2005 (UTC) reply
_>|< 16:33, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 17:10, 5 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Proposing renaming, as the category is made up of films that were not directed by Kubrick, but produced or associated with. -- Fallout boy 05:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC) reply