The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Removed from speedy delete. Comment was "The category has never been used, nor has the template it contains, while there is a plentiful listing over at the Creatures Wiki addon page". -- Henrygb 23:30, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Category was created for a list of Dillard University buildings, which have since been merged into the main article. The only other one is a forerunner institution. -- Christopherlin 21:13, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:59, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Category is uninstructive and tells the reader nothing. Virtually the entire set of scientific terms newly used in the past 20 years would go in this category. There are tens of THOUSANDS of them! What's the point?-- Deglr6328 19:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Arabia is defined as the Arabian peninsula. Yet in this category there are also Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq (Mesopotamia) that aren't in the peninsula. Inaccurate category that should be deleted. Yuber (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Couldn't it be renamed Geography of the Middle East? Luis rib 19:03, 26 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 02:05, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
All images have been moved to wikisource, currently contains 2 images. Unnecessary-- nixie 13:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge -- Azkar 02:07, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This category is not needed. There is already Category:Lists of bridges which is not a big category. The 3 lists in this category can easily be found there. Samuel Wantman 06:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Replaced by the properly-romanized Category:Dojinshi (matching the article Dojinshi). DopefishJustin (・∀・) 05:51, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 19:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:54, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Removed from speedy delete. Comment was "The category has never been used, nor has the template it contains, while there is a plentiful listing over at the Creatures Wiki addon page". -- Henrygb 23:30, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Category was created for a list of Dillard University buildings, which have since been merged into the main article. The only other one is a forerunner institution. -- Christopherlin 21:13, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:59, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Category is uninstructive and tells the reader nothing. Virtually the entire set of scientific terms newly used in the past 20 years would go in this category. There are tens of THOUSANDS of them! What's the point?-- Deglr6328 19:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Arabia is defined as the Arabian peninsula. Yet in this category there are also Lebanon, Syria, and Iraq (Mesopotamia) that aren't in the peninsula. Inaccurate category that should be deleted. Yuber (talk) 15:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Couldn't it be renamed Geography of the Middle East? Luis rib 19:03, 26 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete -- Azkar 02:05, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
All images have been moved to wikisource, currently contains 2 images. Unnecessary-- nixie 13:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Merge -- Azkar 02:07, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
This category is not needed. There is already Category:Lists of bridges which is not a big category. The 3 lists in this category can easily be found there. Samuel Wantman 06:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Rename -- Azkar 01:52, 31 May 2005 (UTC) reply
Replaced by the properly-romanized Category:Dojinshi (matching the article Dojinshi). DopefishJustin (・∀・) 05:51, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 19:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)