Sorry to bring this up back again. I think there was not much debate on this. When the cfd vote was started, there was no entry in the Wikipedia:Categories for deletion, so I did put my opinion to keep the category on the talk page of the category. I did'nt see any more discussion out there, so I assumed nothing more is going on on this. I think this is wrongly deleted. The purpose of having a different category, is so that it does not clutter out the Category:India.
Also this not been used much was rectified, by categorizing appropriate articles in the same category. (13:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC))
This should be brought back. alren ( talk · contribs)13:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
(added by Choster 00:55, 13 July 2005 (UTC) entry notes listed on Category:Military bases in North Carolina)
It is moot for these particular case, but I'm interested in how Choster sees "bases" as "hypercategorization." I don't understand what you're trying to illustrate above. Maurreen 15:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Sorry to bring this up back again. I think there was not much debate on this. When the cfd vote was started, there was no entry in the Wikipedia:Categories for deletion, so I did put my opinion to keep the category on the talk page of the category. I did'nt see any more discussion out there, so I assumed nothing more is going on on this. I think this is wrongly deleted. The purpose of having a different category, is so that it does not clutter out the Category:India.
Also this not been used much was rectified, by categorizing appropriate articles in the same category. (13:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC))
This should be brought back. alren ( talk · contribs)13:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
(added by Choster 00:55, 13 July 2005 (UTC) entry notes listed on Category:Military bases in North Carolina)
It is moot for these particular case, but I'm interested in how Choster sees "bases" as "hypercategorization." I don't understand what you're trying to illustrate above. Maurreen 15:34, 20 July 2005 (UTC)