The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
What is the point of this category exactly? There is one good article on scrums, do we need any others? If not we really don't need this category. I really can't think what else could be added here. GordyB 22:51, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Can I put in a plea for people to put things in Category:Rugby union or Category:Rugby league rather than Category:Rugby. Few things naturally belong in Category:Rugby. GordyB 22:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Mountains of Asia for consistency with other continents. RedWolf 20:59, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 11:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Market research. I've always heard "market research," and Google finds it to be a considerably more common term. This does not seem to be an AE/BE difference as both British and American websites use "market research." Marketing research is also more ambiguous, as it can be read as "selling research." - SimonP 18:21, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:35, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Universities and colleges affiliated with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America per Wiki policy on acronyms. Those outside of the ELCA are unfamiliar with what ELCA stands for. - Ichabod 2 July 2005 22:34 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge English physicians into English doctors -- Kbdank71 11:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Merge and redirect to Category:English physicians. -- Tabor 2 July 2005 03:40 (UTC)
I agree with merging English physicians to English doctors. Hiding 20:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 11:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
→ category:American philanthropists. Dunc| ☺ 15:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Himalaya as it's the technically correct name (see Himalaya). RedWolf 08:54, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This appears to be a mis-translation of Prix du Québec - scientifique, "Quebec (Science) Award". Furthermore, there is only one article in this category, the subject of which has received more prestigious awards. A category for this award seems unnecessary. Peter Grey 08:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:25, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Bismarck-Mandan -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Fargo-Moorhead -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Grand Forks-East Grand Forks -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
What is the point of this category exactly? There is one good article on scrums, do we need any others? If not we really don't need this category. I really can't think what else could be added here. GordyB 22:51, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Can I put in a plea for people to put things in Category:Rugby union or Category:Rugby league rather than Category:Rugby. Few things naturally belong in Category:Rugby. GordyB 22:35, 11 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Mountains of Asia for consistency with other continents. RedWolf 20:59, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 11:37, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Market research. I've always heard "market research," and Google finds it to be a considerably more common term. This does not seem to be an AE/BE difference as both British and American websites use "market research." Marketing research is also more ambiguous, as it can be read as "selling research." - SimonP 18:21, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:35, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Universities and colleges affiliated with the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America per Wiki policy on acronyms. Those outside of the ELCA are unfamiliar with what ELCA stands for. - Ichabod 2 July 2005 22:34 (UTC)
The result of the debate was merge English physicians into English doctors -- Kbdank71 11:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Merge and redirect to Category:English physicians. -- Tabor 2 July 2005 03:40 (UTC)
I agree with merging English physicians to English doctors. Hiding 20:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus (keep) -- Kbdank71 11:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
→ category:American philanthropists. Dunc| ☺ 15:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Kbdank71 11:29, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to Category:Himalaya as it's the technically correct name (see Himalaya). RedWolf 08:54, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:26, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
This appears to be a mis-translation of Prix du Québec - scientifique, "Quebec (Science) Award". Furthermore, there is only one article in this category, the subject of which has received more prestigious awards. A category for this award seems unnecessary. Peter Grey 08:22, 10 July 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:25, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Bismarck-Mandan -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:23, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Fargo-Moorhead -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 11:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC) reply
I would recommend deletion of this category because it attempts to duplicate what is already found in the more inclusive Category:Grand Forks-East Grand Forks -- MatthewUND 04:41, July 10, 2005 (UTC)