The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. Duplicate of correct Category:Royal Australian Navy ships. Joshbaumgartner 22:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
These categories are not needed. >>> Sagitario 22:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
-- Abögarp 15:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Badly named. Haiduc 19:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Badly named. Haiduc 19:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This category does not fit in with the hierarchy. Furthermore, it contains only one article, one which probably shouldn't be in here. The creator of this category seems to be a confused anonymous user, probably a newbie. Aecis praatpaal 19:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep at Category:Color -- Kbdank71 14:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
130.159.254.2 ( talk · contribs) misused the {{ categoryredirect}} template to move everything in Category:Color to Category:Colour. Please confirm or deny whether the change is valid. -- AllyUnion (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename for the same reason given in the next nomination. - Mayumashu 04:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to a more formal name that will avoid any confusion with the uni with the same name in Belfast. - Mayumashu 03:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This category has one article; Category:Otagoites has a considerably larger number. As an Otagoite myself, I suggest transferring the odd-one-out, then deleting Category:People of Otago. Grutness... wha? 12:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:03, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. Duplicate of correct Category:Royal Australian Navy ships. Joshbaumgartner 22:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 14:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
These categories are not needed. >>> Sagitario 22:43, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
-- Abögarp 15:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Badly named. Haiduc 19:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:05, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Badly named. Haiduc 19:41, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 19:07, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This category does not fit in with the hierarchy. Furthermore, it contains only one article, one which probably shouldn't be in here. The creator of this category seems to be a confused anonymous user, probably a newbie. Aecis praatpaal 19:19, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep at Category:Color -- Kbdank71 14:12, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
130.159.254.2 ( talk · contribs) misused the {{ categoryredirect}} template to move everything in Category:Color to Category:Colour. Please confirm or deny whether the change is valid. -- AllyUnion (talk) 09:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 19:01, 16 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:13, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename for the same reason given in the next nomination. - Mayumashu 04:07, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 14:15, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Rename to a more formal name that will avoid any confusion with the uni with the same name in Belfast. - Mayumashu 03:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 14:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
This category has one article; Category:Otagoites has a considerably larger number. As an Otagoite myself, I suggest transferring the odd-one-out, then deleting Category:People of Otago. Grutness... wha? 12:38, 9 December 2005 (UTC) reply