< December 5 | December 7 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, partial replication of real article Anna Ancher Melchoir 23:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
None of the other constructions have "state," not even Georgia.
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The proposed name will be clear to non-Irish people. It is desirable to use the plural form. Rhollenton 21:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty & mis-named. Correct category exists as Category:Victorian era ships. Joshbaumgartner 19:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with CAT:CSD. Why does this exist? — Phil Welch Katefan's ridiculous poll 19:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
A category for a small informal part of Dublin. Not part of a system. 3 articles after 8 months. Merge Rhollenton 18:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I feel that this one should conform with Category:Luxembourgish sportspeople. Rename Punkmorten 16:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, accidental creation. Exists correctly as Category:Shipwrecks in the Mediterranean. Joshbaumgartner 16:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. I could only find one article, SS Sauternes, not needing a category of its own. Joshbaumgartner 16:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Pointless category. Constructed languages are logically subdivided into artistic languages, international auxiliary languages and engineered languages (according to purpose) or into a priori languages and a posteriori languages (according to the source of their vocabulary). But a subdivision according to the countries where their creators comes from is of no significance at all; of no more significance than adding the sparrow to a category Birds of the USA. Conlangs rarely have a significance that is connected anyhow to a country. Besides, this category is the only one in its kind. Therefore, I nominate it for deletion. See also Talk:Toki Pona#Category:Languages of Canada. -- IJzeren Jan In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij 11:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The word "System" is part of the proper noun, and should be capitalized. I'm not sure if it's best to include the U.S. or not; someone better versed on those naming conventions should weigh in, but it seems unnecessary. The full official name is the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. -- SPUI ( talk) 11:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
United States Numbered Highways is the official name of the system, used from the beginning in 1927 to the present by AASHTO. -- SPUI ( talk) 11:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. Articles and cats belong in more appropriate Category:Aircraft carriers of Russia and Category:Aircraft carriers of the Soviet Union. Joshbaumgartner 03:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Per Wikipedia naming conventions. Most aircraft carrier categories already correct. Joshbaumgartner 03:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Sounds like it is for a group of islands called the Stockholm Islands, which is isn't of course. category:Islands of Stockholm would be better. Rename Rhollenton 00:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
< December 5 | December 7 > |
---|
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:45, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, partial replication of real article Anna Ancher Melchoir 23:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:51, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
None of the other constructions have "state," not even Georgia.
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:49, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The proposed name will be clear to non-Irish people. It is desirable to use the plural form. Rhollenton 21:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:46, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty & mis-named. Correct category exists as Category:Victorian era ships. Joshbaumgartner 19:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was keep -- Kbdank71 15:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Redundant with CAT:CSD. Why does this exist? — Phil Welch Katefan's ridiculous poll 19:02, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:42, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
A category for a small informal part of Dublin. Not part of a system. 3 articles after 8 months. Merge Rhollenton 18:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I feel that this one should conform with Category:Luxembourgish sportspeople. Rename Punkmorten 16:37, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:35, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty, accidental creation. Exists correctly as Category:Shipwrecks in the Mediterranean. Joshbaumgartner 16:30, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:34, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. I could only find one article, SS Sauternes, not needing a category of its own. Joshbaumgartner 16:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Pointless category. Constructed languages are logically subdivided into artistic languages, international auxiliary languages and engineered languages (according to purpose) or into a priori languages and a posteriori languages (according to the source of their vocabulary). But a subdivision according to the countries where their creators comes from is of no significance at all; of no more significance than adding the sparrow to a category Birds of the USA. Conlangs rarely have a significance that is connected anyhow to a country. Besides, this category is the only one in its kind. Therefore, I nominate it for deletion. See also Talk:Toki Pona#Category:Languages of Canada. -- IJzeren Jan In mij legge alle fogultjes een ij 11:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The word "System" is part of the proper noun, and should be capitalized. I'm not sure if it's best to include the U.S. or not; someone better versed on those naming conventions should weigh in, but it seems unnecessary. The full official name is the Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and Defense Highways. -- SPUI ( talk) 11:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was no consensus -- Kbdank71 15:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
United States Numbered Highways is the official name of the system, used from the beginning in 1927 to the present by AASHTO. -- SPUI ( talk) 11:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Kbdank71 15:25, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. Articles and cats belong in more appropriate Category:Aircraft carriers of Russia and Category:Aircraft carriers of the Soviet Union. Joshbaumgartner 03:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Per Wikipedia naming conventions. Most aircraft carrier categories already correct. Joshbaumgartner 03:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename as nominated -- Kbdank71 15:26, 14 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Sounds like it is for a group of islands called the Stockholm Islands, which is isn't of course. category:Islands of Stockholm would be better. Rename Rhollenton 00:44, 6 December 2005 (UTC) reply