The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. I know several categories of this type were recently deleted but I could not find the discussion MeltBanana 23:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
One of these duplicates need to go. The adjective form is predominent for media categories and as far as I know "El Salvadorean" is a legitimate form. The other one only contained the music subcategory, which I have moved. Merge/Delete CalJW 21:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Hackwrench ( talk · contribs) created this to replace category:pseudoscience against consensus below. Anyway, it is pointless with category:pseudoscience and category:protoscience. — Dunc| ☺ 19:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Unless this is a major project it will remain a particularly poorly defined and incomplete category. What is a cult figure anyway? Unless anyone can come up with an encyclopedic definition and can maintain the list I say it should go. Sachabrunel 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The abbreviation should be expanded and the full title should be used as it is in the article title United States Department of Energy National Laboratories. Rename Sumahoy 16:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a category duplication, as far as I can tell. - TexasAndroid 16:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
These two categories are nearly identical, so that most entries and subcategories appear in both, and in fact both are subcategories of each other. I think that "sail" and "sailing" have identical meanings, but I could be wrong about that. I suggest category:Sail be deleted, and all entries that aren't already there be merged into Category:Sailing.-- Mike Selinker 16:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Poorly defined, inherently POV. We have Category:Comic book awards for this. grendel| khan 16:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
There are quite a few places named Toledo, in the US and elsewhere. See Toledo (disambiguation). This category needs to be more specific. Ezeu 09:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. K1Bond007 01:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Honest mistake: the correct name is "Buffalonians". No significant history. I created a new cat and did the renames. -- Fplay 08:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I think this category should be deleted since it isn't self-evident, it's too difficult to maintain, and we already have a list at Fortune 500. Furthermore, "Category:Fortune Global 500" has already been deleted for the same reasons, see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Fortune Global 500. Mushroom 08:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 18:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
There's another category named "Neurological disorders," so one of them had to go. I also googled both and the results: 520,000 pages for "neurological" vs. 67,000 for neurologic. CDN99 17:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Empty. I know several categories of this type were recently deleted but I could not find the discussion MeltBanana 23:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:49, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
One of these duplicates need to go. The adjective form is predominent for media categories and as far as I know "El Salvadorean" is a legitimate form. The other one only contained the music subcategory, which I have moved. Merge/Delete CalJW 21:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Hackwrench ( talk · contribs) created this to replace category:pseudoscience against consensus below. Anyway, it is pointless with category:pseudoscience and category:protoscience. — Dunc| ☺ 19:17, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Unless this is a major project it will remain a particularly poorly defined and incomplete category. What is a cult figure anyway? Unless anyone can come up with an encyclopedic definition and can maintain the list I say it should go. Sachabrunel 17:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:52, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The abbreviation should be expanded and the full title should be used as it is in the article title United States Department of Energy National Laboratories. Rename Sumahoy 16:40, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and redirect -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Appears to be a category duplication, as far as I can tell. - TexasAndroid 16:19, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was merge and delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:55, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
These two categories are nearly identical, so that most entries and subcategories appear in both, and in fact both are subcategories of each other. I think that "sail" and "sailing" have identical meanings, but I could be wrong about that. I suggest category:Sail be deleted, and all entries that aren't already there be merged into Category:Sailing.-- Mike Selinker 16:06, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:56, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Poorly defined, inherently POV. We have Category:Comic book awards for this. grendel| khan 16:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was rename -- Rick Block ( talk) 17:57, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
There are quite a few places named Toledo, in the US and elsewhere. See Toledo (disambiguation). This category needs to be more specific. Ezeu 09:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was Delete. K1Bond007 01:15, 24 December 2005 (UTC) reply
Honest mistake: the correct name is "Buffalonians". No significant history. I created a new cat and did the renames. -- Fplay 08:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 18:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I think this category should be deleted since it isn't self-evident, it's too difficult to maintain, and we already have a list at Fortune 500. Furthermore, "Category:Fortune Global 500" has already been deleted for the same reasons, see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Category:Fortune Global 500. Mushroom 08:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete -- Rick Block ( talk) 18:02, 22 December 2005 (UTC) reply
There's another category named "Neurological disorders," so one of them had to go. I also googled both and the results: 520,000 pages for "neurological" vs. 67,000 for neurologic. CDN99 17:04, 13 December 2005 (UTC) reply