Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): PHP
Function Summary: Tagging IP ranges of educational institutes with {{ sharedipedu}}
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever I see a shared IP range.
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: This bot will be given a range of an IP range, and the name of the educational institute. It then goes through the talk pages of all the IPS in the range. It only will post the template if the IP has contribs, and the talk page exists, in order to be useful and practical. I have generated a sample at User:Soxred93/shared.
Using the API? Q T C 03:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I noticed this bot was
blocked two days ago, this task would require an unblock, is the previous task that caused the block going to stay off until fixed? (I trust you, just trying to make sure nothing's crontabbed... Those are easy to forget about....)
SQL
Query me! 03:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. for this task ONLY, the block task may not be performed without further discussion.
MBisanz
talk 22:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Only remaining question I have is where the mapping of addresses comes from? IE: What source are you using to say IP foo.bar.baz.qux belongs to School Quux. Q T C 00:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Looks useful and unproblematic. I'd give it a green flag. – Quadell ( talk) ( random) 13:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply
It seems Bjweeks reverted the addition of the tag to the pages in the 123.100.0.0/16 range. I've asked him to comment here. Also, it might be better if the bot avoided tagging pages like User talk:216.93.156.13 where the last warning was in 2006. Perhpas if the page hasn't been edited in the past 6 months, the bot won't add the tag. Mr. Z-man 21:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong reservations: Is there any reason that a range of IPs should be tagged other than if the IPs are problematic? Making edits like this that "expose" legitimate editors can very shortly become an issue with regard to the privacy policy. Diminishing anonymity simply because we can makes little sense to me. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag.
BJ
Talk 06:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
reply
Request Expired.
BJ
Talk 06:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
reply
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): PHP
Function Summary: Tagging IP ranges of educational institutes with {{ sharedipedu}}
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Whenever I see a shared IP range.
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details: This bot will be given a range of an IP range, and the name of the educational institute. It then goes through the talk pages of all the IPS in the range. It only will post the template if the IP has contribs, and the talk page exists, in order to be useful and practical. I have generated a sample at User:Soxred93/shared.
Using the API? Q T C 03:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC) reply
I noticed this bot was
blocked two days ago, this task would require an unblock, is the previous task that caused the block going to stay off until fixed? (I trust you, just trying to make sure nothing's crontabbed... Those are easy to forget about....)
SQL
Query me! 03:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. for this task ONLY, the block task may not be performed without further discussion.
MBisanz
talk 22:41, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
reply
Only remaining question I have is where the mapping of addresses comes from? IE: What source are you using to say IP foo.bar.baz.qux belongs to School Quux. Q T C 00:34, 2 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Looks useful and unproblematic. I'd give it a green flag. – Quadell ( talk) ( random) 13:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC) reply
It seems Bjweeks reverted the addition of the tag to the pages in the 123.100.0.0/16 range. I've asked him to comment here. Also, it might be better if the bot avoided tagging pages like User talk:216.93.156.13 where the last warning was in 2006. Perhpas if the page hasn't been edited in the past 6 months, the bot won't add the tag. Mr. Z-man 21:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC) reply
Strong reservations: Is there any reason that a range of IPs should be tagged other than if the IPs are problematic? Making edits like this that "expose" legitimate editors can very shortly become an issue with regard to the privacy policy. Diminishing anonymity simply because we can makes little sense to me. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 05:14, 14 July 2008 (UTC) reply
A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag.
BJ
Talk 06:48, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
reply
Request Expired.
BJ
Talk 06:04, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
reply