The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
That's not much activity. Are you doing any interwiki work not covered by some other bot? My inclination is not to approve this until you have a month experience running interwiki on other projects. What do other BAG think?
Gimmetrow 02:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Far too bureaucratic. If he's running good code here and on other wikis, there's no reason not to let him do it. — Werdnatalk 06:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
OK, I see User:Rtz is an admin/crat on bat-smg. It would have helped to note that.
Gimmetrow
Works on lt.wikipedia, no need for a trial run here. Approved. — Werdnatalk 12:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
That's not much activity. Are you doing any interwiki work not covered by some other bot? My inclination is not to approve this until you have a month experience running interwiki on other projects. What do other BAG think?
Gimmetrow 02:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)reply
Far too bureaucratic. If he's running good code here and on other wikis, there's no reason not to let him do it. — Werdnatalk 06:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
OK, I see User:Rtz is an admin/crat on bat-smg. It would have helped to note that.
Gimmetrow
Works on lt.wikipedia, no need for a trial run here. Approved. — Werdnatalk 12:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.