I would like Grafikbot ( talk · contribs) to tag military history related articles with the {{ WPMILHIST}} template for assessement purposes as defined in the Wikipedia:1.0 program.
A complete automatic tagging bot is still out of reach, so for the time being, a limited tagging will be executed as follows:
Note: a rather lengthy debate took place on WP:AN a few weeks ago, and a consensus emerged that such a tagging was desirable for the whole WP project. Obviously, a bot can't tag everything, but I think it just can handle this one. :)
Can someone approve this please? :)
Thanks, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 15:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply
For your collective information, I note that there are 11,216 articles in or under {{ mil-stub}}. That even misses a few, since for some incomprehensible reason, aircraft are largely split by decade, rather than into military and non-. There's 3,374 that are specifically "military history". Let's be as sure as possible these are all within the Wikiproject's scope before getting carried away with this (especially the "non-historical" ones). Alai 07:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I just took a quick run through the various stubs involved here. The only one in which I found articles not within the project's scope is {{ weapon-stub}} and its children, as there are some hunting-related articles there. Hence, we should not automate tagging for that tree. As far as I can tell, however, all of the other children of {{ mil-stub}} are reasonably safe to tag by bot. Kirill Lokshin 04:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) reply
What's the status here? Are you still waiting for a response or did you get approved? -- kingboyk 12:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Approved (already has a flag). Please follow the instructions next time. --
RM
00:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply
I would like Grafikbot ( talk · contribs) to tag military history related articles with the {{ WPMILHIST}} template for assessement purposes as defined in the Wikipedia:1.0 program.
A complete automatic tagging bot is still out of reach, so for the time being, a limited tagging will be executed as follows:
Note: a rather lengthy debate took place on WP:AN a few weeks ago, and a consensus emerged that such a tagging was desirable for the whole WP project. Obviously, a bot can't tag everything, but I think it just can handle this one. :)
Can someone approve this please? :)
Thanks, Grafikm (AutoGRAF) 15:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC) reply
For your collective information, I note that there are 11,216 articles in or under {{ mil-stub}}. That even misses a few, since for some incomprehensible reason, aircraft are largely split by decade, rather than into military and non-. There's 3,374 that are specifically "military history". Let's be as sure as possible these are all within the Wikiproject's scope before getting carried away with this (especially the "non-historical" ones). Alai 07:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC) reply
I just took a quick run through the various stubs involved here. The only one in which I found articles not within the project's scope is {{ weapon-stub}} and its children, as there are some hunting-related articles there. Hence, we should not automate tagging for that tree. As far as I can tell, however, all of the other children of {{ mil-stub}} are reasonably safe to tag by bot. Kirill Lokshin 04:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC) reply
What's the status here? Are you still waiting for a response or did you get approved? -- kingboyk 12:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC) reply
Approved (already has a flag). Please follow the instructions next time. --
RM
00:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
reply