Operator: Fastily ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 08:07, Sunday, August 13, 2017 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Java
Source code available: [1]
Function overview: Post various reports at Wikipedia:Database reports instead of the bot's userspace.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: Few
Namespace(s):Project
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): n/a
Function details: see function overview
As long as the reports are not duplicates of existing ones, I personally have no objection. However, I would suggest that a discussion is needed, probably on the database reports talk page, to establish consensus for those reports to go there. TheMagikCow ( T) ( C) 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Posted a notification on the DBR talk page. Regards, FASTILY 17:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC) reply
This sounds fine to me. Any and all help maintaining the database reports is welcome. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply
{{
BAGAssistanceNeeded}}
It's been about a week with no objections. Given that this is a non-controversial task restricted to the subpages of DBR, could this be approved or given a trial? Thanks,
FASTILY
00:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
reply{{
OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
Any update on this?—
CYBERPOWER (
Chat)
08:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete. See history of Wikipedia:Database reports/Recently Untagged Files for Dated Deletion. - FASTILY 03:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC) reply
Operator: Fastily ( talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 08:07, Sunday, August 13, 2017 ( UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic
Programming language(s): Java
Source code available: [1]
Function overview: Post various reports at Wikipedia:Database reports instead of the bot's userspace.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):
Edit period(s): Daily
Estimated number of pages affected: Few
Namespace(s):Project
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): n/a
Function details: see function overview
As long as the reports are not duplicates of existing ones, I personally have no objection. However, I would suggest that a discussion is needed, probably on the database reports talk page, to establish consensus for those reports to go there. TheMagikCow ( T) ( C) 11:25, 13 August 2017 (UTC) reply
Posted a notification on the DBR talk page. Regards, FASTILY 17:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC) reply
This sounds fine to me. Any and all help maintaining the database reports is welcome. -- MZMcBride ( talk) 03:44, 14 August 2017 (UTC) reply
{{
BAGAssistanceNeeded}}
It's been about a week with no objections. Given that this is a non-controversial task restricted to the subpages of DBR, could this be approved or given a trial? Thanks,
FASTILY
00:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
reply{{
OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
Any update on this?—
CYBERPOWER (
Chat)
08:48, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
reply
Trial complete. See history of Wikipedia:Database reports/Recently Untagged Files for Dated Deletion. - FASTILY 03:02, 3 September 2017 (UTC) reply