Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): Wikipedia:AWB; approval required
Function Summary: Recategorisation
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Weekly
Edit rate requested: 8 edits per minute, or less
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Moving Category:Wikipedia essays that are in userspace into Category:User essays as requested on Wikipedia:Bot requests.
Although MaxSem was going to do this with RoboMaxCyberSem, I have offered to manage this task to save him some stress. — E talk BAG 12:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Will this bot simply remove Category:Wikipedia essays instead of replacing it when the page already contains {{ essay}}? MaxSem( Han shot first!) 12:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --
maelgwn -
talk 23:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
There are plenty of existing bots that could do this, and it looks like under 600 edits, which could be done with AWB with a low edit rate in just an hour or two. Is there a reason that a new bot flag is needed here? This isn't an objection, just a question. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 23:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Approved. --
maelgwn -
talk 07:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): Wikipedia:AWB; approval required
Function Summary: Recategorisation
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Weekly
Edit rate requested: 8 edits per minute, or less
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Moving Category:Wikipedia essays that are in userspace into Category:User essays as requested on Wikipedia:Bot requests.
Although MaxSem was going to do this with RoboMaxCyberSem, I have offered to manage this task to save him some stress. — E talk BAG 12:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Will this bot simply remove Category:Wikipedia essays instead of replacing it when the page already contains {{ essay}}? MaxSem( Han shot first!) 12:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Approved for trial (20 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. --
maelgwn -
talk 23:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
reply
There are plenty of existing bots that could do this, and it looks like under 600 edits, which could be done with AWB with a low edit rate in just an hour or two. Is there a reason that a new bot flag is needed here? This isn't an objection, just a question. — Carl ( CBM · talk) 23:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Approved. --
maelgwn -
talk 07:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
reply