Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): PHP using Dusty Library
Function Overview: Archive reviews at Wikipedia:Editor review
Edit period(s): Daily
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details:
DustyBot will maintain the WP:ER page and its archives. It will take over closing reviews, listing reviews in the archives, and notifying users that their reviews are about to be closed. Reviews will be closed when these conditions are met:
DustyBot will notify editors of impending closures. It will not close a review until at least 3 days after the notification. The minimum review time (default 30 days) and the inactivity time (7 days) will be configurable by anyone. Source code for this task can be found at User:DustyBot/dusty_er.php.
Approved for trial (7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Okay, let's fire it up and see if it works. – Quadell ( talk) 19:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Approved. Looks like it's working great. – Quadell ( talk) 17:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic
Programming Language(s): PHP using Dusty Library
Function Overview: Archive reviews at Wikipedia:Editor review
Edit period(s): Daily
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y
Function Details:
DustyBot will maintain the WP:ER page and its archives. It will take over closing reviews, listing reviews in the archives, and notifying users that their reviews are about to be closed. Reviews will be closed when these conditions are met:
DustyBot will notify editors of impending closures. It will not close a review until at least 3 days after the notification. The minimum review time (default 30 days) and the inactivity time (7 days) will be configurable by anyone. Source code for this task can be found at User:DustyBot/dusty_er.php.
Approved for trial (7 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Okay, let's fire it up and see if it works. – Quadell ( talk) 19:11, 17 April 2009 (UTC) reply
Approved. Looks like it's working great. – Quadell ( talk) 17:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC) reply