Operator: User:Blofeld of SPECTRE T
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually assisted
Programming Language(s): Using {{subst:PAGENAME}} to generate articles at speed
Function Summary: Stubbing several thousand articles on French communes.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): I will be doing runs daily or every other day when I have time to generate a sustained run. It would follow my editing pattern and would probably tackle around 500 communes or a department at a time.
Edit rate requested: 5-6 edits per minute maximum
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Stubbing several thousand articles on french communes which are having been missing on english wikipedia for many years ,unlike the other wikipedias. Aim is to get all of the pages started on english wikipedia to provide a platform to build upon and develop the articles to eventually get universal coverage on french settlements. There is an enormous amount of articles missing some provinces in France as yet only have about 10 articles maximum out of 500 or so. Eventually they should all develop into fuller articles and this is a task I bleieve is of huge benefit in the long term to French geography ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 14:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
I have seen you doing this on your account a lot, but as this isn't really a bot per se, I am going to have you {{ BotSpeedy}}. ~ Dreamy § 14:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
But independently of the bot I create a lot of articles on various parts of the encyclopedia which are clearly of encyclopedic value and are well written. Can anybody hands down say that I am not as good an article editor as any of the admininstrators on here? I believe the fact that I have created 14,000 articles on wikipedia which are still on wikipedia and not all stubs should account for something. It would make life a lot easier for new page patrollers if my new articles on my normal account were "trusted" too. I don't normally create 5 articles a minute like here but I still create a lot of general content anyway. Remember I am only here because editors were slightly erked at having to patrol them -even my normal course of editing . If my new articles were trusted as not "spam" which I strongly believe they shouldn't be and hope others agree then I could continue with my own account and not have to be continously concerned with new page patrollers equally having to put in a lot of work to unmark them. By all means get a consensus on it between bureacrats or whatever. I think this would be the best course of action. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 21:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Well unfortunately I don't have time to hang around. I'll continue adding them with my own account then and clogging up the pages and leaving a lot of unneccesary patrolling for people as before. I really don't see why it is a problem to flag my normal account anyway and how it could possibly cause any problems -I create more articles than any administrators on wikipedia anyway. I turned down adminship olong ago because I dislike the bureacratic side of wikipedia and prefer to generate my efforts into what I believe matters most -building an encyclopedia of the highest possible standard and depth. If noone here can recognize that I don't create "spam" and contribute constructively then thats your problem not mine ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 10:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Exactly Jack. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 13:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply
My lord, I never realised it was such a big deal. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 21:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Well by the end of the week theres going to be lot of articles created which could have been easily flagged. Nobody can say I didn't try to help new page patrollers ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 11:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Operator: User:Blofeld of SPECTRE T
Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually assisted
Programming Language(s): Using {{subst:PAGENAME}} to generate articles at speed
Function Summary: Stubbing several thousand articles on French communes.
Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): I will be doing runs daily or every other day when I have time to generate a sustained run. It would follow my editing pattern and would probably tackle around 500 communes or a department at a time.
Edit rate requested: 5-6 edits per minute maximum
Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N
Function Details: Stubbing several thousand articles on french communes which are having been missing on english wikipedia for many years ,unlike the other wikipedias. Aim is to get all of the pages started on english wikipedia to provide a platform to build upon and develop the articles to eventually get universal coverage on french settlements. There is an enormous amount of articles missing some provinces in France as yet only have about 10 articles maximum out of 500 or so. Eventually they should all develop into fuller articles and this is a task I bleieve is of huge benefit in the long term to French geography ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ Talk? 14:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
I have seen you doing this on your account a lot, but as this isn't really a bot per se, I am going to have you {{ BotSpeedy}}. ~ Dreamy § 14:27, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
But independently of the bot I create a lot of articles on various parts of the encyclopedia which are clearly of encyclopedic value and are well written. Can anybody hands down say that I am not as good an article editor as any of the admininstrators on here? I believe the fact that I have created 14,000 articles on wikipedia which are still on wikipedia and not all stubs should account for something. It would make life a lot easier for new page patrollers if my new articles on my normal account were "trusted" too. I don't normally create 5 articles a minute like here but I still create a lot of general content anyway. Remember I am only here because editors were slightly erked at having to patrol them -even my normal course of editing . If my new articles were trusted as not "spam" which I strongly believe they shouldn't be and hope others agree then I could continue with my own account and not have to be continously concerned with new page patrollers equally having to put in a lot of work to unmark them. By all means get a consensus on it between bureacrats or whatever. I think this would be the best course of action. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 21:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Well unfortunately I don't have time to hang around. I'll continue adding them with my own account then and clogging up the pages and leaving a lot of unneccesary patrolling for people as before. I really don't see why it is a problem to flag my normal account anyway and how it could possibly cause any problems -I create more articles than any administrators on wikipedia anyway. I turned down adminship olong ago because I dislike the bureacratic side of wikipedia and prefer to generate my efforts into what I believe matters most -building an encyclopedia of the highest possible standard and depth. If noone here can recognize that I don't create "spam" and contribute constructively then thats your problem not mine ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 10:25, 31 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Exactly Jack. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 13:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply
My lord, I never realised it was such a big deal. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 21:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Well by the end of the week theres going to be lot of articles created which could have been easily flagged. Nobody can say I didn't try to help new page patrollers ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ $1,000,000? 11:29, 3 February 2008 (UTC) reply