The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Function Overview: add interwiki links and fix double redirects
Edit period(s): daily
Already has a bot flag: yes (ru, bg, cs, uk, sr, be-x-old, simple, pending sl, be, ja, zh, sk, hu, tpi)
Function Details: see “Function Overview”
Discussion
Does this bot run on any other wikis? MBisanztalk 01:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, now at 6 wikis. Pending 7 more apart from here. I wrote that above. —
hiNt (
talk) 08:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.MBisanztalk 08:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Trial complete.. —
hiNt (
talk) 11:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
I will approve it tomorrow assuming no one objects. MBisanztalk 03:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Approved. I looked through the contributions, and lo, they were good. –
Quadell(
talk) 13:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Approved.
Function Overview: add interwiki links and fix double redirects
Edit period(s): daily
Already has a bot flag: yes (ru, bg, cs, uk, sr, be-x-old, simple, pending sl, be, ja, zh, sk, hu, tpi)
Function Details: see “Function Overview”
Discussion
Does this bot run on any other wikis? MBisanztalk 01:14, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Yes, now at 6 wikis. Pending 7 more apart from here. I wrote that above. —
hiNt (
talk) 08:38, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.MBisanztalk 08:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Trial complete.. —
hiNt (
talk) 11:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)reply
I will approve it tomorrow assuming no one objects. MBisanztalk 03:58, 3 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Approved. I looked through the contributions, and lo, they were good. –
Quadell(
talk) 13:30, 3 June 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.