- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zarkora ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This series does not meet WP:GNG, and none of the books are notable in their own right. I was unable to find any reviews or coverage in independent and reliable (i.e., non-blog) sources. The authors do not have Wikipedia articles, so there is not a good redirect target (well, the first book has an article, but I'm also nominating that for deletion separately). DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I wasn't able to find anything that could be used to establish notability for the series or the first book. I ended up looking at the official website, which lists a review from Kirkus Indie, the company's paid review service. This can't be used to establish notability and the absence of anything else confirms that this series just doesn't pass notability guidelines despite some mild popularity from SPS. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zarkora ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This series does not meet WP:GNG, and none of the books are notable in their own right. I was unable to find any reviews or coverage in independent and reliable (i.e., non-blog) sources. The authors do not have Wikipedia articles, so there is not a good redirect target (well, the first book has an article, but I'm also nominating that for deletion separately). DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. DanCherek ( talk) 04:50, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I wasn't able to find anything that could be used to establish notability for the series or the first book. I ended up looking at the official website, which lists a review from Kirkus Indie, the company's paid review service. This can't be used to establish notability and the absence of anything else confirms that this series just doesn't pass notability guidelines despite some mild popularity from SPS. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 12:11, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.