- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 03:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- ZaapTV ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not-notable appliance brand. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. No independent refs in article. Nothing obvious in google. This was originally a PROD, but it was contested on my talk page, so I moved it to AfD. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Television-related deletion discussions.
• Gene93k (
talk)
00:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per A7.-- Laun chba ller 00:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc 21 03:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
- ZaapTV ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not-notable appliance brand. No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources. No independent refs in article. Nothing obvious in google. This was originally a PROD, but it was contested on my talk page, so I moved it to AfD. Stuartyeates ( talk) 00:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the
list of Television-related deletion discussions.
• Gene93k (
talk)
00:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per A7.-- Laun chba ller 00:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.