- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Furthermore, overall consensus is that the awards the subject has received do not qualify as "well-known and significant industry award"(s) (quoted from WP:PORNBIO). North America 1000 03:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yurizan Beltran ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject appears to fail current WP:NACTOR and WP:PORNBIO requirements. Has no major award wins and is not independently notable. Pax 08:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - winner - meets of WP:PORNBIO and also is notable.
Subtropical-man
talk
(en-2) 18:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- How does the subject meet PORNBIO, let alone pass GNG?
Pax
19:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Subtropical-man always votes keep in porn-related discussions. In this case the award won is not a well-known award counting for passing PORNBIO. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is always safe to ignore this user's input into porn bio AfDs, as do the closing admins. Tarc ( talk) 12:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- How does the subject meet PORNBIO, let alone pass GNG?
Pax
19:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, Beltran won an award and has multiple nominations for other awards. Has apparently appeared in a mainstream media program. IMO she meets PORNBIO criteria. -- fdewaele, 7 May 2015, 18:47 CET.
- Delete. Her RISE Award for "Hottest Butt" fails both parts of the well-known/significant standard under PORNBIO: RISE Awards are no more than minimally notable (if even that) not well-known, and body/body parts awards generally lack significance (see, for example, the Jayden James AFD [1] and DRV [2]. where a similar and higher-visibility award was held not to satisfy PORNBIO). No credible argument the subject passes the GNG, and a single, fleeting talk show spot certainly fails the multiple featured mainstream appearances standard. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite ( talk) 17:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - 1 obscure award does not qualify for wp:pornbio. Subject also fails to meet the general notability guidelines, as there are no reliable sources to be found that cover the subject in-depth. The references in the article at present are to a blurb in a Top 10 list and a pile of AVN, XBIZ, etc...press releases for nominations. Tarc ( talk) 12:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The only claim is the RISE award and the article on that just got deleted as non-notable. I'd say that was a clincher. Spartaz Humbug! 14:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Furthermore, overall consensus is that the awards the subject has received do not qualify as "well-known and significant industry award"(s) (quoted from WP:PORNBIO). North America 1000 03:53, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Yurizan Beltran ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject appears to fail current WP:NACTOR and WP:PORNBIO requirements. Has no major award wins and is not independently notable. Pax 08:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:59, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 18:00, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - winner - meets of WP:PORNBIO and also is notable.
Subtropical-man
talk
(en-2) 18:35, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- How does the subject meet PORNBIO, let alone pass GNG?
Pax
19:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Subtropical-man always votes keep in porn-related discussions. In this case the award won is not a well-known award counting for passing PORNBIO. • Gene93k ( talk) 19:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is always safe to ignore this user's input into porn bio AfDs, as do the closing admins. Tarc ( talk) 12:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- How does the subject meet PORNBIO, let alone pass GNG?
Pax
19:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
- Keep, Beltran won an award and has multiple nominations for other awards. Has apparently appeared in a mainstream media program. IMO she meets PORNBIO criteria. -- fdewaele, 7 May 2015, 18:47 CET.
- Delete. Her RISE Award for "Hottest Butt" fails both parts of the well-known/significant standard under PORNBIO: RISE Awards are no more than minimally notable (if even that) not well-known, and body/body parts awards generally lack significance (see, for example, the Jayden James AFD [1] and DRV [2]. where a similar and higher-visibility award was held not to satisfy PORNBIO). No credible argument the subject passes the GNG, and a single, fleeting talk show spot certainly fails the multiple featured mainstream appearances standard. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) ( talk) 01:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Fails GNG. Carrite ( talk) 17:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - 1 obscure award does not qualify for wp:pornbio. Subject also fails to meet the general notability guidelines, as there are no reliable sources to be found that cover the subject in-depth. The references in the article at present are to a blurb in a Top 10 list and a pile of AVN, XBIZ, etc...press releases for nominations. Tarc ( talk) 12:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The only claim is the RISE award and the article on that just got deleted as non-notable. I'd say that was a clincher. Spartaz Humbug! 14:37, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.