The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It is not true. There is a significant coverage of him in Russian-language sources. Also, he has an important state award that means that he satisfies per rules criteria.
Kirill C1 (
talk)
13:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Not quite a
WP:HEY–this AfD was flawed originally–but the additions since the nomination have assured that this BLP is suitable for inclusion in accordance with
WP:GNG. Appears to be an instance of failed
WP:BEFORE. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
23:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, besides notability, the article as originally "written" by
User:Thriley was absolutely below minimal acceptable standards for the mainspace, I would had moved it back to draft space until it had a minimum of text and context, or I would had even supported a deletion per
WP:TNT ("if the article's content is useless but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article" as "people tend to be more inclined to fill red links"). Now thanks to the improvements of other users it is barely acceptable, but I am a bit shocked in 2022 people still create 1-line biographies.
Cavarrone07:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Dubrovin is covered in many Russian news webpages for his numerous cameo roles and has an acknowledged state award (see examples of notability in
Wikipedia:The GNG and notability for actors). I added some references according to
WP:GNG. However, I believe that the article should be significantly expanded to better demonstrate the subject's notability.
ThegaBolt (
talk)
18:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
It is not true. There is a significant coverage of him in Russian-language sources. Also, he has an important state award that means that he satisfies per rules criteria.
Kirill C1 (
talk)
13:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep: Not quite a
WP:HEY–this AfD was flawed originally–but the additions since the nomination have assured that this BLP is suitable for inclusion in accordance with
WP:GNG. Appears to be an instance of failed
WP:BEFORE. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
23:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep, besides notability, the article as originally "written" by
User:Thriley was absolutely below minimal acceptable standards for the mainspace, I would had moved it back to draft space until it had a minimum of text and context, or I would had even supported a deletion per
WP:TNT ("if the article's content is useless but the title might be useful, then delete the content to help encourage a new article" as "people tend to be more inclined to fill red links"). Now thanks to the improvements of other users it is barely acceptable, but I am a bit shocked in 2022 people still create 1-line biographies.
Cavarrone07:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - Dubrovin is covered in many Russian news webpages for his numerous cameo roles and has an acknowledged state award (see examples of notability in
Wikipedia:The GNG and notability for actors). I added some references according to
WP:GNG. However, I believe that the article should be significantly expanded to better demonstrate the subject's notability.
ThegaBolt (
talk)
18:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.