The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Looking at the arguments in the previous discussion, it would seem that whoever recreated the article has NOT addressed the issues that were brought up. That in itself is grounds for deletion, quoting from the WP:G4 tag, "...[failure in addressing] the reasons for which the material was deleted". Aside from that, the subject is blatantly non-notable, and there's also no news source to assert any form of notability. I am well aware that this article does not fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion, as it is not (exactly) a lookalike to its previous revision; however, the fact still stands that the previous concerns were still not addressed at all. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 15:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 06:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Looking at the arguments in the previous discussion, it would seem that whoever recreated the article has NOT addressed the issues that were brought up. That in itself is grounds for deletion, quoting from the WP:G4 tag, "...[failure in addressing] the reasons for which the material was deleted". Aside from that, the subject is blatantly non-notable, and there's also no news source to assert any form of notability. I am well aware that this article does not fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion, as it is not (exactly) a lookalike to its previous revision; however, the fact still stands that the previous concerns were still not addressed at all. Sk8erPrince ( talk) 15:08, 29 November 2016 (UTC)