The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR ‑Scottywong | spout _ 02:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Yu Liu

Yu Liu (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass the GNG, virtually all sources are local to Niagara. Does not appear to pass any of the guidelines for notability for academics. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• • The creator of this article seems to suggest on their talk page that Guggenheim Fellows meet the major award criteria for academics. Considering that there are several hundred Guggenheim fellowships granted annually, I am not sure we want to accept that view. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 19:45, 10 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:33, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:34, 12 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep I wish we had consensus on this Guggenheim thing. That, and two citations in a Niagara newspaper... I'm not sure but I think he just barely passes. Chris Troutman ( talk) 00:44, 13 July 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment It should be explicitly noted that a Guggenheim fellowship is indeed mentioned as a criteria in WP:PROF. However, apart from his two books being held by low three-digit numbers of libraries each, I can find little additional information about this community college prof. -- Axolotl Nr.733 ( talk) 12:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC) reply
• Comment - I'm afraid that us community college teachers get no respect automatic notability here. Bearian ( talk) 17:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 09:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. 13:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 13:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Tentatively delete I can't find anything about him. Does he have a Chinese name?-- 180.172.239.231 ( talk) 13:28, 26 July 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.