The result was delete. Proto:: type 11:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Was speedied twice with no notability claims; author has recreated again, and added a link to a review and a link to a radio show playlist. I don't think either satisfies WP:MUSIC; the [ BBC link is a trivial mention (a brief mention on a playlist); regarding the "review," I did a Google search for a snippet of the text from the review and found it on three different sites; none is a review site that I'd heard of before (none of the "reviews" have anything negative to say whatsoever). I'm pretty sure that the "reviews" on the site are just promos/press releases submitted by the subject or the subjects rep. The name of the article's creator is also the name of the subject's own record label; it all adds up to self-promotion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
[2] comment was added by Rarechords
The result was delete. Proto:: type 11:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC) reply
Was speedied twice with no notability claims; author has recreated again, and added a link to a review and a link to a radio show playlist. I don't think either satisfies WP:MUSIC; the [ BBC link is a trivial mention (a brief mention on a playlist); regarding the "review," I did a Google search for a snippet of the text from the review and found it on three different sites; none is a review site that I'd heard of before (none of the "reviews" have anything negative to say whatsoever). I'm pretty sure that the "reviews" on the site are just promos/press releases submitted by the subject or the subjects rep. The name of the article's creator is also the name of the subject's own record label; it all adds up to self-promotion. OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC) reply
[2] comment was added by Rarechords