The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 14:22, 9 August 2019 (UTC) reply

Yoli

Yoli (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. Fails GNG. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 13:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 13:34, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^{( talk)} 15:15, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

• Speedy Keep Weak Keep, I heavily disagree about the claim to "not notable". It has been covered by trusted news source, and searches for "yoli soda" provide 859,000 (roughly) results on Google. It is a Mexican product, true, but the location in which it is produced doesn't discredit the need for an article on the topic. (The article COULD use an image though.) Utopes ( talk) 18:05, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Utopes: 900,000 results and yet I could only find this and this by going through a few pages of Google and all five pages of Google News. Were your search efforts more successful? WP:GHITS. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 01:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Well, sadly my whole premise relied on a fallacy; I didn't know WP:GHITS was a topic to avoid. I had more fruitful results myself, and I will be adding them to the actual article. My new vote is more reflective now. Utopes ( talk) 16:08, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

• Weak keep Weak delete or merge, I don't see report from reliable source, but if it is a market leader in the Mexico market, it should be kept, locals there might be able to point us to better sources. Viztor ( talk) 22:43, 18 July 2019 (UTC) reply

@ Viztor: If we have no independent reliable sources we can hardly keep the article. A redirect might be possible but I'm not sure where it would lead, except maybe FEMSA. I'm happy to keep the article if there are some Mexican articles somewhere. Anarchyte ( talk | work) 01:12, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Anarchyte: Yes, we're on the same page. I can find some results, though few is usable, I'm waiting for editors from local market who might be more familiar with the subject. Viztor ( talk) 01:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

Further search showed it is just a local drink, hence the change of opinion. Viztor ( talk) 05:00, 19 July 2019 (UTC) reply

• Keep I added formatting and the Toronto Life reference. It used to be a regional drink but has since broken out across borders and seems to have developed a cult following. StonyBrook ( talk) 19:32, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.