- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 15:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Yoda Bangladesh
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yoda Bangladesh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:PROMOTIONAL article is sourced two two press releases and one legitimate news article. BEFORE finds nothing further redeeming. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 22:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:GNG. I can find at least two news sources, [1], [2] with non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. -- Zayeem (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Do we have many examples of profitmaking companies that meet our WP:SIGCOV standards and can only be sourced to two WP:RS? Chetsford ( talk) 02:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. I did my own WP:BEFORE search and found nothing of note. The closest thing to reliable sources are boilerplate press releases published in local newspapers, which does not establish lasting notability per the terms of WP:GNG. Michepman ( talk) 16:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The Daily Star coverage [3] is mostly about the platform itself and not the company. The bits about it are " Yoda eliminates the middle man and gives tutors a free platform to find suitable tuitions. Yoda currently has a website with over 3500 registered tutors with their specialties, qualifications listed on the website. Yoda aims to streamline the private tuition business for all parties involved, and best of all, it’s free." Three sentences overall. And here [4] relies on a WP:PRIMARY quote from a Yoda related person. Neither meet WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches don't make anything else like Michempan has said. Fails WP:NCORP for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 13:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The Daily Star coverage is also obviously a rehashed press release - none of the sourcing is of CORPDEPTH standard, so this fails WP:NCORP. GirthSummit (blether) 19:27, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV.Further it is upcoming and started in 2017 and also a case of WP:TOOSOON may be notable in the future not at this point. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 19:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sam Walton ( talk) 15:34, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Yoda Bangladesh
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yoda Bangladesh ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:PROMOTIONAL article is sourced two two press releases and one legitimate news article. BEFORE finds nothing further redeeming. Fails GNG. Chetsford ( talk) 22:58, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:42, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:43, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - passes WP:GNG. I can find at least two news sources, [1], [2] with non-trivial coverage from reliable sources. -- Zayeem (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Do we have many examples of profitmaking companies that meet our WP:SIGCOV standards and can only be sourced to two WP:RS? Chetsford ( talk) 02:38, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. I did my own WP:BEFORE search and found nothing of note. The closest thing to reliable sources are boilerplate press releases published in local newspapers, which does not establish lasting notability per the terms of WP:GNG. Michepman ( talk) 16:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The Daily Star coverage [3] is mostly about the platform itself and not the company. The bits about it are " Yoda eliminates the middle man and gives tutors a free platform to find suitable tuitions. Yoda currently has a website with over 3500 registered tutors with their specialties, qualifications listed on the website. Yoda aims to streamline the private tuition business for all parties involved, and best of all, it’s free." Three sentences overall. And here [4] relies on a WP:PRIMARY quote from a Yoda related person. Neither meet WP:CORPDEPTH. My searches don't make anything else like Michempan has said. Fails WP:NCORP for the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Jovanmilic97 ( talk) 13:16, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete The Daily Star coverage is also obviously a rehashed press release - none of the sourcing is of CORPDEPTH standard, so this fails WP:NCORP. GirthSummit (blether) 19:27, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:SIGCOV.Further it is upcoming and started in 2017 and also a case of WP:TOOSOON may be notable in the future not at this point. Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 19:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.