- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Yifan Tang
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yifan Tang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources appear to be primarily press releases or to mention Tang in passing. He does not appear to be notable separately from his company, if his company is notable. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: he does have publications to his name
[1] and I see him mentioned in a number of news articles. He's difficult to dismiss as non-notable.
Praemonitus (
talk)
22:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Many people have published things, which is why having publications is not a measure of notability. He needs to be more than "mentioned", and in articles that aren't just reprinted press releases. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 16:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I think he is very notable, but not by wikipedia standards, I hope someone finds some references, but I can not. ( Dushan Jugum ( talk) 22:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 14:56, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Yifan Tang
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Yifan Tang ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Sources appear to be primarily press releases or to mention Tang in passing. He does not appear to be notable separately from his company, if his company is notable. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 05:39, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~Ruyaba~ {talk} 06:18, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: he does have publications to his name
[1] and I see him mentioned in a number of news articles. He's difficult to dismiss as non-notable.
Praemonitus (
talk)
22:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Many people have published things, which is why having publications is not a measure of notability. He needs to be more than "mentioned", and in articles that aren't just reprinted press releases. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 16:35, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ― Abelmoschus Esculentus ( talk • contribs) 12:12, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 02:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. I think he is very notable, but not by wikipedia standards, I hope someone finds some references, but I can not. ( Dushan Jugum ( talk) 22:20, 4 March 2019 (UTC)).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.