The result was keep. Consensus is that the sourcing is sufficient to demonstrate notability. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This dress is not notable enough for a separate article, which will never grow beyond a stub. Can it not instead be included in the Cate Blanchett article, as a subsection or brief mention? Dusty| 💬| You can help! 20:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep Has adequate coverage in reliable sources 67 newspaper and magazine sources picked up in HighBeam, cited by all of the top fashion people Cosmopolitan, Vogue as one of the year's highlights in fashion. Cosmopolitan considers it one of the greatest Oscar dresses of all time, that's why it is notable above all I think. Fashion is grossly under covered on wikipedia and we should have way more articles on fashion collections and garments.
This is where Jimmy Wales said that we should have 100 articles on notable individual dresses.
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 12:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Consensus is that the sourcing is sufficient to demonstrate notability. Mark Arsten ( talk) 14:56, 17 April 2013 (UTC) reply
This dress is not notable enough for a separate article, which will never grow beyond a stub. Can it not instead be included in the Cate Blanchett article, as a subsection or brief mention? Dusty| 💬| You can help! 20:48, 10 April 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep Has adequate coverage in reliable sources 67 newspaper and magazine sources picked up in HighBeam, cited by all of the top fashion people Cosmopolitan, Vogue as one of the year's highlights in fashion. Cosmopolitan considers it one of the greatest Oscar dresses of all time, that's why it is notable above all I think. Fashion is grossly under covered on wikipedia and we should have way more articles on fashion collections and garments.
This is where Jimmy Wales said that we should have 100 articles on notable individual dresses.
☯ Bonkers The Clown \(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 12:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC) reply