The result was speedy keep per withdrawal. I'm surprised this was nominated, tbh; it is the most popular Linux desktop environment behind GNOME and KDE.. ( non-admin closure) Sceptre ( talk) 13:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable, doesn't claim to be notable, all sources listed are passing mentions, self-published, or blogs. Contested PROD
Miami33139 (
talk) 00:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn considering LinuxMag source by Reisio and Linux Journal source by OlivierDST. I hope those sources make it into the article so the next person on cleanup patrol doesn't re-nominate the article. What is currently there is not enough.
Miami33139 (
talk) 21:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
reply
The result was speedy keep per withdrawal. I'm surprised this was nominated, tbh; it is the most popular Linux desktop environment behind GNOME and KDE.. ( non-admin closure) Sceptre ( talk) 13:51, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has
policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:
spa|username}} ; suspected
canvassed users: {{subst:
canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for
sockpuppetry: {{subst:
csm|username}} or {{subst:
csp|username}} . |
Not notable, doesn't claim to be notable, all sources listed are passing mentions, self-published, or blogs. Contested PROD
Miami33139 (
talk) 00:35, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn considering LinuxMag source by Reisio and Linux Journal source by OlivierDST. I hope those sources make it into the article so the next person on cleanup patrol doesn't re-nominate the article. What is currently there is not enough.
Miami33139 (
talk) 21:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
reply