The result was nomination withdrawn - keep. Kimchi.sg 23:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Stub, NN thoroughbred TrackerTV ( CW| Castform| Green Valley) 01:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep. Let me address some of the above opinions advocating for deletion.
I wonder if the horse had been a Kentucky Derby or Epsom Derby winner if it would be up for deletion. I think not.
I wonder if any of the people calling for deletion bothered to Google “horse Xcellent”. If they did they would have got 33,000 hits. Not-Notable? The horse certainly was the subject of a enormous interest from the Australian racing public when it crossed the Tasman Sea for the 2005 Melbourne Spring Racing Carnival.
I small number of wikipedians are making great efforts to increase the number of articles on thoroughbred racing around the world and their efforts will not be helped if we have to constantly defend articles on our chosen subject. The article is a stub, and needs expanding, but I strongly believe that it should not be deleted. - Cuddy Wifter 02:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
The result was nomination withdrawn - keep. Kimchi.sg 23:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Stub, NN thoroughbred TrackerTV ( CW| Castform| Green Valley) 01:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC) reply
Strong Keep. Let me address some of the above opinions advocating for deletion.
I wonder if the horse had been a Kentucky Derby or Epsom Derby winner if it would be up for deletion. I think not.
I wonder if any of the people calling for deletion bothered to Google “horse Xcellent”. If they did they would have got 33,000 hits. Not-Notable? The horse certainly was the subject of a enormous interest from the Australian racing public when it crossed the Tasman Sea for the 2005 Melbourne Spring Racing Carnival.
I small number of wikipedians are making great efforts to increase the number of articles on thoroughbred racing around the world and their efforts will not be helped if we have to constantly defend articles on our chosen subject. The article is a stub, and needs expanding, but I strongly believe that it should not be deleted. - Cuddy Wifter 02:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC) reply