The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ☺ ·
Salvidrim! ·
✉ 18:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, can't find any evidence of notability.
Ansh666 03:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I'm not certain that it's "clearly" non-notable as I suspect any sources would be in magazines, but I can't find any evidence of available coverage.
Sam Walton (
talk) 22:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - I think the fact that it was made in 1991 makes it harder to reference
Delete: Not much in the way of
reliable sources, and mentions of it in general are far fewer than would be necessary to show any sort of notability. Supernerd11Firemind^_^Pokedex 06:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article topic lacks
significant coverage from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a
video game reliable sources search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar
♔ 16:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ☺ ·
Salvidrim! ·
✉ 18:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, can't find any evidence of notability.
Ansh666 03:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - I'm not certain that it's "clearly" non-notable as I suspect any sources would be in magazines, but I can't find any evidence of available coverage.
Sam Walton (
talk) 22:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - I think the fact that it was made in 1991 makes it harder to reference
Delete: Not much in the way of
reliable sources, and mentions of it in general are far fewer than would be necessary to show any sort of notability. Supernerd11Firemind^_^Pokedex 06:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete. Article topic lacks
significant coverage from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) It did not have any meaningful hits in a
video game reliable sources search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar
♔ 16:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.