- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
XXYYXX (album)
- XXYYXX (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the concept of a 16-year-old making a record like this does sound interesting, the album lacks notability in independent sources. All sputnikmusic reviews of this album are user reviews, and most reviews I found using google searches are basically unreliable blog and wordpress posts. I can't say this record meets WP:NALBUMS. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 21:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete given the lack of independent, reliable coverage. Curro2 ( talk) 01:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Notable artist.
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/xxyyxx-says-hes-head-of-the--illuminati
http://www.clashmusic.com/features/otw-516-xxyyxx --
2A02:1812:C08:E700:9D89:F7E1:C243:62FC (
talk) 19:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- JadestarXL said it best below. Notable artist doesn't always equal notable album. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 04:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The album itself is not notable enough to have a page of its own, even if the artist is notable. JadestarXL ( talk) 01:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best as none of this is convincing for a serpatate article. SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
XXYYXX (album)
- XXYYXX (album) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
While the concept of a 16-year-old making a record like this does sound interesting, the album lacks notability in independent sources. All sputnikmusic reviews of this album are user reviews, and most reviews I found using google searches are basically unreliable blog and wordpress posts. I can't say this record meets WP:NALBUMS. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 21:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete given the lack of independent, reliable coverage. Curro2 ( talk) 01:32, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Notable artist.
http://noisey.vice.com/blog/xxyyxx-says-hes-head-of-the--illuminati
http://www.clashmusic.com/features/otw-516-xxyyxx --
2A02:1812:C08:E700:9D89:F7E1:C243:62FC (
talk) 19:45, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
- JadestarXL said it best below. Notable artist doesn't always equal notable album. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 04:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The album itself is not notable enough to have a page of its own, even if the artist is notable. JadestarXL ( talk) 01:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanjagenije (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best as none of this is convincing for a serpatate article. SwisterTwister talk 22:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.