The result was redirect to World War III in popular culture. Redirect created, all the content is still available for a merge. Tone 15:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has a number of arguably irresolvable problems: 1. It reads like a personal essay, with little or no objective content, and heavy reliance on primary sources. 2. It is highly partial in its coverage, and only has a vague grasp of its subject matter. For instance, it seems to equate a "World War" with a "War of the Worlds", which is not the same. 3. Any valid information this article contains would be better placed in World War III in popular culture. Serendi pod ous 16:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to World War III in popular culture. Redirect created, all the content is still available for a merge. Tone 15:12, 12 December 2010 (UTC) reply
This article has a number of arguably irresolvable problems: 1. It reads like a personal essay, with little or no objective content, and heavy reliance on primary sources. 2. It is highly partial in its coverage, and only has a vague grasp of its subject matter. For instance, it seems to equate a "World War" with a "War of the Worlds", which is not the same. 3. Any valid information this article contains would be better placed in World War III in popular culture. Serendi pod ous 16:56, 5 December 2010 (UTC) reply