- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 21:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Woodworm Cricket Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough in-depth independent coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of England-related deletion discussions.
MT Train
Talk
11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have added two more sources (one recent); there seems to be more available so keep for now, perhaps with a request for more citations. SovalValtos ( talk) 11:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a small company, the refs in the article don't suggest notability, i googled for news and there are a few bits there, but not enough. Coverage revolves around their use of celebrities and venture capital funding. Szzuk ( talk) 18:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The organisation seems to be a non-notable one and the article contain some dead links. Abishe ( talk) 10:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 21:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Woodworm Cricket Company ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough in-depth independent coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Störm (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. MT Train Talk 11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the
list of England-related deletion discussions.
MT Train
Talk
11:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- I have added two more sources (one recent); there seems to be more available so keep for now, perhaps with a request for more citations. SovalValtos ( talk) 11:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a small company, the refs in the article don't suggest notability, i googled for news and there are a few bits there, but not enough. Coverage revolves around their use of celebrities and venture capital funding. Szzuk ( talk) 18:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The organisation seems to be a non-notable one and the article contain some dead links. Abishe ( talk) 10:25, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.