The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I am sorry as I deleted the AFD template by mistake. Please accept my apologies. But I have added some references. As the book was published 18 years ago and it is very hard to find more reliable references. I did my best. However, the book covers part of US local history and more importantly covers women. I believe the article has enough reliable sources to cover books notability. Thanks.
GharouniTalk 09:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment The Reno Gazette-Journal does have an article mentioning the book from Sunday, February 23, 2003, page 14. (
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/150830448/) If anyone has library access or newspaper.com privileges they can determine if it constitutes significant coverage in combination with the more local coverage.
24.151.50.175 (
talk) 17:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't meet notability standards and doesn't meet basic threshold standards as set in
Wikipedia:Notability (books). This book is self-published, does not have an ISBN number and is not cataloged with the Library of Congress.
Glendoremus (
talk) 22:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Books need to be very notable before a WP article on them should be allowed. Local history publications are generally NN. Possibly there may be scope for including something very brief on the book in the article on Truckee. If any of the 30 women meet WP notability standards, there might be a article on them in which the book is cited.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Parvin_Darabi#Works (author). The Reno Gazette-Journalarticle and other sources in the article contain enough information to improve the section in the target article.
24.151.50.175 (
talk) 16:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge as above, that article needs expanding and it would be relevant there, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge Unimportant.
TuorEladar (
talk) 20:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. I am sorry as I deleted the AFD template by mistake. Please accept my apologies. But I have added some references. As the book was published 18 years ago and it is very hard to find more reliable references. I did my best. However, the book covers part of US local history and more importantly covers women. I believe the article has enough reliable sources to cover books notability. Thanks.
GharouniTalk 09:17, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment The Reno Gazette-Journal does have an article mentioning the book from Sunday, February 23, 2003, page 14. (
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/150830448/) If anyone has library access or newspaper.com privileges they can determine if it constitutes significant coverage in combination with the more local coverage.
24.151.50.175 (
talk) 17:42, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Doesn't meet notability standards and doesn't meet basic threshold standards as set in
Wikipedia:Notability (books). This book is self-published, does not have an ISBN number and is not cataloged with the Library of Congress.
Glendoremus (
talk) 22:15, 28 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete Books need to be very notable before a WP article on them should be allowed. Local history publications are generally NN. Possibly there may be scope for including something very brief on the book in the article on Truckee. If any of the 30 women meet WP notability standards, there might be a article on them in which the book is cited.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 14:44, 29 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Parvin_Darabi#Works (author). The Reno Gazette-Journalarticle and other sources in the article contain enough information to improve the section in the target article.
24.151.50.175 (
talk) 16:51, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Merge as above, that article needs expanding and it would be relevant there, imv
Atlantic306 (
talk) 20:35, 30 March 2020 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 20:36, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete or merge Unimportant.
TuorEladar (
talk) 20:43, 4 April 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.